TITLE

Lawsuits Ready as Net Neutrality Rules Take Effect

PUB. DATE
September 2011
SOURCE
Multichannel News;9/26/2011, Vol. 32 Issue 36, p3
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article reports on lawsuits that await the U.S. Federal Communications Commission with the implementation of the network-neutrality rules on November 20, 2011.
ACCESSION #
66329554

 

Related Articles

  • Net-neutrality rules to take effect in November. Sasso, Brendan // Hill;9/23/2011, Vol. 18 Issue 130, p12 

    The article announces that the network neutrality rules of the Federal Communications Commission will take effect on November 20, 2011 in the U.S.

  • Void for Vagueness?  // Broadcasting & Cable;8/3/2015, Vol. 145 Issue 27, p30 

    The article discusses the legal challenge launched by telecommunication and cable service providers against the U.S. Federal Communications Commission's network neutrality rules and the Title II of the Communications Act.

  • Table Talk.  // Broadcasting & Cable;9/29/2014, Vol. 144 Issue 35, p40 

    The author comments on how the U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) should explain its net neutrality proposals to net neutrality activists to prevent a repeat of the legal challenges against the rules.

  • Das Net Neutrality. HOLLOWAY, DANIEL // Back Stage (1946-5440);9/29/2011, Vol. 52 Issue 39, p5 

    The article reports on the new net neutrality rules by the U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) which would effectively prevent broadband service providers from discriminating against particular types of content.

  • FCC delays 'fast lanes' deadline. Tummarello, Kate; Goad, Ben; Al-Faruque, Ferdous // Hill;7/16/2014, Vol. 21 Issue 80, p10 

    The article reports on the decision of the U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to extend the deadline of public comments for the network neutrality rules until July 18, 2014.

  • Hill Threat on Net Neutrality. EGGERTON, JOHN // Multichannel News;1/28/2013, Vol. 34 Issue 4, p11 

    The article presents information on the U.S. Representative for California's 18th congressional district Anna Eshoo who has threatened to introduce network neutrality bill upon the loss of the U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) in the U.S. court.

  • Decoding "Network Neutrality": A User-Friendly Explanation of Verizon v. FCC and Its Impact on Latinos. Gonzalez, Jessica // La Prensa San Diego;1/24/2014, Vol. 38 Issue 4, p3 

    The article discusses regarding the Federal Communications Commission's network neutrality rules that were disappointed by U.S. federal appeals court and mentions three important goals of these rules such as non blocking of broadband service and non discrimination of against any edge providers.

  • FCC chief: No 'Slow lanes' under new net neutrality rules. Tummarello, Kate // Hill;5/1/2014, Vol. 21 Issue 52, p10 

    The article reports on the refusal of the Federal Communications Commission Chairman Tom Wheeler to allow slowing down of traffic by internet providers under his new net neutrality proposal.

  • Only Title II will ensure fairness among ISPs. van Schewick, Barbara // Hill;9/16/2014, Vol. 21 Issue 97, p20 

    The article offers the author's insights on the adoption of network neutrality rules under Title II of the U.S. Communications Act by the U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to ensure market fairness among Internet service providers (ISPs) in the U.S.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics