BNFL waste plans face rejection

Knight, Helen
March 2002
Engineer (00137758);3/29/2002, Vol. 291 Issue 7595, p7
Reports on the possible rejection faced by BNFL's plans to stop pumping radioactive waste into the Irish Sea from the Great Britain Environment Agency. Criticism of BNFL's proposed technology; Proposal of BNFL to pour chemical tetraphenyl phosphonium bromide into waste streams; Concerns of Nirex regarding the proposal.


Related Articles

  • The world's dustbin. Edwards, Rob // New Scientist;01/31/98, Vol. 157 Issue 2119, p11 

    Reports that British Nuclear Fuels, a government owned company is promoting a plan for the storing of American radioactive waste. Terms of the plan; Amount the United States administration will pay for the service; Comments from a BNFL spokesman.

  • Call for plutonium shipment to be postponed. Wakefield, Julie // Nature;1/5/1995, Vol. 373 Issue 6509, p4 

    Reports on the Greenpeace International, Nuclear Control Center and Citizens Nuclear Information Center's protest against the shipment of reprocessed nuclear waste from France to Japan. Edwin S. Lyman's report on the shipment; British Nuclear Fuels Ltd.'s comments on Lyman's report; Criticisms...

  • Nirex failure could sink Sellafield. Edwards, Rob // New Scientist;04/19/97, Vol. 154 Issue 2078, p5 

    Reports on the claims of nuclear experts on Great Britain's decision to abandon plans to build an underground nuclear waste laboratory. Possible effects of the decision to the country's future in reprocessing; Potential problems facing British Nuclear Fuels Ltd. in operating its reprocessing plant.

  • Removal plant may be solution.  // Engineer (00137758);3/29/2002, Vol. 291 Issue 7595, p7 

    Reports on Nirex's proposal for BNFL to build a special technetium removal plant in Great Britain. Cost of building the facility; Advice from Great Britain's Environment Agency. INSET: SO WHERE DOES TECHNETIUM-99 COME FROM?.

  • Dishonourable discharge.  // New Scientist;12/09/2000, Vol. 168 Issue 2268, p3 

    Discusses the concern over the possibility that the British Nuclear Fuels (BNFL) could be allowed to pump radioactive technetium-99 into the Irish Sea. Discussion of the OSPAR convention which is a proposal to govern marine pollution; Disagreement over the health hazards posed by technetium;...

  • Watchdog wants stronger controls over nuclear plants.  // Professional Engineering;11/04/98, Vol. 11 Issue 20, p4 

    Reports on the Great Britain-based Environment Agency's call for stringent planning controls on nuclear plants. Construction cost of the British Nuclear Fuels's mixed oxide fuel plant; Impact of the decision of the agency on the future of mixed oxide fuel plant.

  • Nuclear waste sent to landfill.  // Professional Engineering;5/5/2010, Vol. 23 Issue 7, p9 

    The article reports on the move of the Environment Agency in Great Britain to investigate on how the five bags of low-level radioactive waste from Sellafied, England were dumped in a landfill site.

  • TREATMENT PLANT TAKEN 'INDOORS' TO MEET CONSTRUCTION DEADLINE.  // ENR: Engineering News-Record;03/12/2001, Vol. 246 Issue 10, p18 

    Reports the construction of a nuclear waste plant by BNFL Inc. at the Idaho National Environment Engineering Laboratory. Lawsuit over plan to incinerate a portion of radioactive materials; Delay in the construction; Construction of steel tent over the site.

  • BNFL anger over tighter waste rule.  // Utility Week;12/20/2002, Vol. 19 Issue 1, p6 

    Deals with the concerns of British Nuclear Fuels over government plans for tight control of a radioactive metal present in waste discharged into the Irish Sea from Sellafield. Impact of the disposal of the metal on foreign relations between British, Irish and Norwegian governments; Support of...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics