September 2011
Malakoff News (TX);9/ 9/2011, Vol. 102 Issue 35, p1A
The article presents a Bible verse from Romans 6:21 concerning the benefit of one's individual did reap from shameful things, which resulting to death.


Related Articles

  • The Popes Complaint To His Minion Cardinals: The queried date of STC 19483 confirmed by a source. Werner, Hans // Notes & Queries;Mar94, Vol. 41 Issue 1, p74 

    Discusses the confirmation of the queried date of verse satire `The Popes Complaint To His Minion Cardinals'. Celebration of the confusion of Imperial and Catholic forces; Narrowing of the date; Support for the inference.

  • Unjust Enrichment and Wrongful Enrichment. Birks, Peter // Texas Law Review;Jun2001, Vol. 79 Issue 7, p1767 

    Analyzes the relation between unjust enrichment and restitution under the Restatement of the Law of Restitution and Unjust Enrichment. Description of the schism in the law of restitution between the quadrationists and the multicausalists; Nature of injust enrichment; Necessity of distinguishing...

  • Unjust Enrichment by Transfer: Some Comparative Remarks. Dannemann, Gerhard // Texas Law Review;Jun2001, Vol. 79 Issue 7, p1837 

    Compares English and German laws on the classification of unjust enrichment. Overview of the rule in the unjust enrichment case of Moses versus Macferlan; Comparison of the attempts of English and German law to develop a systematic approach toward the law of unjust enrichment; Developments in...

  • Unjust Enrichment, Restitution, and Wrongs. Edelman, James J. // Texas Law Review;Jun2001, Vol. 79 Issue 7, p1869 

    Focuses on the problem caused by the conflation of unjust enrichment and awards of restitution for wrongs. Analysis of the problem through the law of wrongs; Overview of the cases illustrating the problem; Discussion on disorgement and restitutionary damages.

  • Restitution for Wrongs: The Measure of Recovery. Friedmann, Daniel // Texas Law Review;Jun2001, Vol. 79 Issue 7, p1879 

    Addresses the measure of recovery in the restitution for wrongs. Normal and actual measurements of recovery; Analysis of attributed loss and attributed gain; Examination of the defendant's culpability and the nature and extent of his contribution.

  • What Renders Enrichment Unjust? Gergen, Mark P. // Texas Law Review;Jun2001, Vol. 79 Issue 7, p1927 

    Analyzes the law of unjust enrichment as a heading of obligation. Other headings of obligations in restitution; Analysis of enrichment by impoverishment; Hinge of enrichment.

  • Protection of Competition Rules Via the Law of Restitution. Grosskopf, Ofer // Texas Law Review;Jun2001, Vol. 79 Issue 7, p1981 

    Examines the role of restitutionary remedies in competitive settings. Distinction between allocation by entitlement and allocation by competition; Analytical implications of allocation by entitlement and allocation by competition; Conclusion.

  • Quantum Meruit for the Subcontractor: Has Restitution Jumped Off Dawson's Dock? Rendleman, Doug // Texas Law Review;Jun2001, Vol. 79 Issue 7, p2055 

    Examines several questions and the reasons many courts and commentators would give to refuse quantum meruit to AsbestOut in the restitution case of AsbestOut versus Harriet Homeowner. Relationship between restitution and related doctrines; Discussion on the principles of confinement; Risks and...

  • Restitution and Equity: An Analysis of the Principle of Unjust Enrichment. Sherwin, Emily // Texas Law Review;Jun2001, Vol. 79 Issue 7, p2083 

    Examines the principle of unjust enrichment under the law of restitution and its connection to equity. Conceptions of the principle of unjust enrichment; Description of an alternative approach in which unjust enrichment functions as a legal principle; Conclusions.


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics