Penalizing hospitals for bad care

Collier, Roger
September 2011
CMAJ: Canadian Medical Association Journal;9/6/2011, Vol. 183 Issue 12, pE785
Academic Journal
The article focuses on the pay for outcomes (P4O), a financial incentive that will be received by hospitals based on the result of patient treatments. It mentions that the incentive would help reduce the number of treatments that were made for bad care treatment, improve patient care, and saves health care systems. It says that it could help eliminate additional hospital payments for treatments that were linked to negative results that could be avoided such as surgery complications.


Related Articles

  • new reimbursement models reward clinical excellence. Corrigan, Karen; Ryan, Robert H. // hfm (Healthcare Financial Management);Nov2004, Vol. 58 Issue 11, p98 

    Reports on the fact that pay-for-performance means that quality and revenue are no longer separate issues for healthcare providers in the U.S. Discovery of the lack of traditional healthcare reimbursement models; Ability of measurement tools to document clinical quality; Role of public scrutiny...

  • Health system changes under pay-for-performance: the effects of Rwanda's national programme on facility inputs. Ngo, Diana K. L.; Sherry, Tisamarie B.; Bauhoff, Sebastian // Health Policy & Planning;Feb2017, Vol. 32 Issue 1, p11 

    Pay-for-performance (P4P) programmes have been introduced in numerous developing countries with the goal of increasing the provision and quality of health services through financial incentives. Despite the popularity of P4P, there is limited evidence on how providers achieve performance gains...

  • Track E6: Quality of care.  // European Journal of Public Health;Feb2006 Supplement 1, Vol. 16, p97 

    The article offers information on quality of care research in Europe. One study explored the effectiveness of computerized guidelines on patients, the behavior of clinicians and organization outcomes in an international setting. Another paper investigated whether the new pay-for-performance...

  • Impacts of pay for performance on the quality of primary care. Allen, T.; Mason, T.; whittaker, W. // Risk Management & Healthcare Policy;2014, Vol. 7, p113 

    Increasingly, financial incentives are being used in health care as a result of increasing demand for health care coupled with fiscal pressures. Financial incentive schemes are one approach by which the system may incentivize providers of health care to improve productivity and/or adapt to...

  • Physician confidence promotes pay-for-performance compliance. Rizik, Emad // Managed Healthcare Executive;Feb2005, Vol. 15 Issue 2, p45 

    This article reports that paying physicians for performance is one of managed care's hottest trends. According to recent figures from the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations (JCAHO), about 100 active pay-for-performance (P4P) programs are operating across the U.S. JCAHO...

  • Pay-for-Performance in Safety Net Settings: Issues, Opportunities, and Challenges for the Future. Young, Gary; Meterko, Mark; White, Bert; Sautter, Karen; Bokhour, Barbara; Baker, Errol; Silver, Jason // Journal of Healthcare Management;Mar/Apr2010, Vol. 55 Issue 2, p132 

    A major trend among Medicaid programs is the adoption of pay-for-performance (P4P) programs, but little evidence exists about the impact of these programs on quality improvement. Our in-depth case investigation of P4P in two safety net settings suggests that such programs may have minimal...

  • Using patient experience within pay for performance programmes. Salisbury, Chris // BMJ: British Medical Journal (Overseas & Retired Doctors Edition;10/24/2009, Vol. 339 Issue 7727, p930 

    The author comments on a study which examined response rates and non-response bias in a national survey of patient experience in Great Britain. He relates the findings to the introduction of pay for performance schemes in several countries to incentivise quality of health care improvements. He...

  • The Dark Side of P4P. Weber, David Ollier // Physician Executive;Nov/Dec2005, Vol. 31 Issue 6, p20 

    The article presents a report which examines the pitfalls of pay for performance programs while discussing why some physicians are concerned about the idea of incentive pay and fear it will have a negative impact on patient care. In 2003, gastroenterologist Jim Petersen had 279 encounters with...

  • Shared savings don't jeopardize patient outcomes.  // OR Manager;Feb2012, Vol. 28 Issue 2, p1 

    The article presents information on study, according to which patient outcomes do not change significantly when hospitals and physicians join in a pay-for-performance (P4P) program for eight different types of surgery. The project used a gainsharing model involving three New York City hospitals...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics