March 2002
hfm (Healthcare Financial Management);Mar2002, Vol. 56 Issue 3, p22
Trade Publication
Reports on a hearing by the U.S. Supreme Court of a patients' rights case on January 16, 2002. Background on the Rush Prudential HMO Inc. versus Moran case; Provisions of the Illinois HMO Act; Basis of the decision.


Related Articles

  • RUSH PRUDENTIAL HMO, INC. v. MORAN et al.: certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the seventh circuit .  // Supreme Court Cases: The Twenty-first Century (2000 - Present);2009, p1 

    The article presents information on U.S. Supreme Court case Rush Prudential HMO Inc. v. Moral et al., case number 00-1021, argued on January 16, 2002 and decided on June 20, 2002. Petitioner denied respondent's request to have surgery by an unaffiliated specialist on the ground that the...

  • U.S. Supreme Court Upholds State HMO Act Requirement for Independent Medical Review of ERISA Plan Claim Denial. Conway, Susan G. // Venulex Legal Summaries;2002 Q3, p1 

    The article reports on the ruling of the U.S. Supreme Court on the case Rush Prudential HMO Inc. versus Moran which concerns on the state medical review requirement for Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) plan claim. It held that a health maintenance organization (HMO) that contracts...

  • Independent External Review of Health Maintenance Organizations' Medical-Necessity Decisions. Mariner, Wendy K. // New England Journal of Medicine;12/26/2002, Vol. 347 Issue 26, p2178 

    The article discusses the decision administered by the U.S. Supreme Court in the case Rush Prudential HMO, Inc. v. Moran with reference to the federal Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) of 1974. On June 20, 2002, the court in this case upheld an Illinois state law which necessitates...

  • Texas Law on Independent Review of HMO Denials to be Reconsidered. Pinkall, Jason D. // Venulex Legal Summaries;2002 Q3, p1 

    The article reports that the U.S. Supreme Court has ordered the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals to review its decision striking down the Texas Insurance Code provisions allowing patients to seek independent review of the medical necessity determinations of health maintenance organizations. The...

  • Split standard. Lentz, Rebecca // Modern Physician;Jan2002, Vol. 6 Issue 1, p24 

    Presents information on a case to be heard by the United States Supreme Court on compliance by health plans with external review board laws. Facts of the case Rush Prudential HMO versus Moran; Possible scenarios that will arise from the case.

  • When the HMO says No. Rice, Berkeley // Medical Economics;5/10/2002, Vol. 79 Issue 9, p43 

    Discusses the impact of the U.S. Supreme Court case Rush Prudential HMO versus Moran on the issue of an Illinois law that calls for an independent review when a health maintenance organization would not pay for treatment recommended by the patient's physician. Overview of the lawsuit filed by...

  • Supreme religious revival. Rabkin, Jeremy // American Spectator;Sep97, Vol. 30 Issue 9, p48 

    Opinion. Accusses the United States Supreme Court of `judicial activism' on its decision on different congressional rulings on religion. Implication of the court's decision on Agostini versus Felton and City of Boerne versus Flores; Provisions on the Religious Freedom Act repudiated by the...

  • Supreme Court Practices: An Amendment to 1980 Rules. Gressman, Eugene // American Bar Association Journal;Dec80, Vol. 66 Issue 12, p1530 

    Cites an amendment added by the U.S. Supreme Court to 1980 rules which requires that virtually all documents filed in the Court by or on behalf of a corporation include a listing of all parent companies, subsidiaries, and affiliates of the corporation. Aim of the listing to enable the justices...

  • State's flow control mechanism may be history.  // BioCycle;Dec97, Vol. 38 Issue 12, p24 

    Talks about the November 10, 1997 decision of the US Supreme Court on the case regarding New Jerseys' Waste Flow Control regulations. Estimated debt the counties in the state had to build incinerators, landfills and other solid waste facilities; Effect of the court's decision; Amount set aside...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics