TITLE

Surgical site marks need monitoring

PUB. DATE
September 2011
SOURCE
Same-Day Surgery;Sep2011, Vol. 35 Issue 9, p94
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article reports on work which the U.S. Joint Commission did with five U.S. hospitals and three ambulatory surgical centers to reduce wrong site surgeries and which resulted in a reduction of wrong site surgeries and found that surgical site marks in patients need monitoring.
ACCESSION #
65832970

 

Related Articles

  • Want zero surgeries on the wrong site?  // Same-Day Surgery;Sep2011, Vol. 35 Issue 9, p93 

    The article reports on work which the U.S. Joint Commission did with five U.S. hospitals and three ambulatory surgical centers to prevent wrong site surgeries and which reduced the risks of wrong site surgeries at the facilities significantly. INSET: Procedures at Risk for Wrong-Site Surgery.

  • Surgical site marks need monitoring.  // Same-Day Surgery;Aug2011 Supplement, p24 

    Th article reports on changes which were made to surgical procedure standards at a four hospital system managed by Lifespan Corp. to reduce wrong-site surgeries.

  • Want zero surgeries on the wrong site?  // Same-Day Surgery;Aug2011 Supplement, p22 

    The article reports on work which the U.S. Joint Commission did with five U.S. hospitals and three ambulatory surgical centers to find ways to prevent wrong-site surgeries and discusses surgical procedures which are at risk for wrong-site surgeries.

  • The time out: How to do it right.  // Same-Day Surgery;Sep2011, Vol. 35 Issue 9, p95 

    The article reports on a technique called a time out that is used at four hospitals that are part of the Providence, Rhode Island based health care provider Lifespan Corp. to prevent wrong site surgeries in their operating rooms.

  • Facility revamps safety after wrong-site surgery.  // Same-Day Surgery;Aug2011 Supplement, p16 

    The article reports on reforms which Cayuga Medical Center in Ithaca, New York made to its patient safety program after a patient underwent surgery in 2008 which was conducted on the wrong side of her back.

  • Patient involvement in preoperative marking. Boyd, Matthew; Holroyd, Ben // British Journal of Hospital Medicine (17508460);Sep2011, Vol. 72 Issue 9, p535 

    A letter to the editor is presented in which the author discusses whether patients should be involved in preoperative marking, and states that using negative marking to indicate the contralateral joint causes confusion.

  • Use of the Universal Protocol in the ED: Clarifications and recommendations for enhanced procedural safety.  // ED Management;Mar2013 Supplement, p1 

    The article discusses the clarifications and recommendations regarding the safety procedure on the use of universal protocol (UP) in the emergency department (ED). It mentions that UP can enhance safety when adapted for ED's risk profile. It states the importance of UP for ED procedures that...

  • Universal Protocol, Safety Goals Tackle Surgical Errors. Lippman, Helen // RN;Sep2003, Vol. 66 Issue 9, p16 

    Reports that the U.S. Joint Commission on Accreditation of Health Organizations has approved the implementation of a universal protocol to avert surgical errors beginning July 2004. Reliance on multiple strategies; Involvement of the entire surgical team to avert such errors.

  • Guidelines can prevent wrong-site surgery.  // Same-Day Surgery;Jul2009, Vol. 33 Issue 7, p67 

    The article offers suggestions from the American Association of Orthopeadic Surgeons (AAOS) on the ways to prevent wrong-site surgery including the compliance of the timeout requirement states in the Universal Protocol from the Joint Commission.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics