California Joins SMARTER as Testing RFP Deadline Nears

June 2011
Educational Marketer;6/20/2011, Vol. 42 Issue 13, p1
Trade Publication
The article reports that California has joined the SMARTER Balanced Assessment Consortium as a member of its governing board. It says that as a member of SMARTER's governing body, the state will decide on the assessment system practiced in the U.S. schools. It also mentions that California was a former member of the Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers (PARCC) consortium.


Related Articles

  • A World-Class Education Eludes Many in the U.S. Hoff, David J. // Education Week;04/11/2001, Vol. 20 Issue 30, p1 

    Reports the dominance of the United States schools among other international schools in terms of educational standards and excellence. Claims on the inavailability of education to children; Use of education test results to inform math and science instruction; Link of the students' economic and...

  • Consortia's Efforts Focus on Wrong Concepts. Brady, Marion // Education Week;9/21/2011, Vol. 31 Issue 4, p28 

    A letter to the editor is presented in response to the article "Consortia Flesh Out Concepts for Common Assessments," which was published in the August 24, 2011 issue.

  • National Tests, Albeit Weaker, Survive Attack. Hoff, David J. // Education Week;10/28/98, Vol. 18 Issue 9, p1 

    Announces that both sides in the testing debate declared victory when United States President Bill Clinton signed an omnibus spending bill that determined the short-term fate of his plan to create voluntary national tests in elementary schools. Comment from Michael Cohen, education adviser of...

  • Assessment-Driven Reform. Ramirez, Al // Phi Delta Kappan;Nov99, Vol. 81 Issue 3, p204 

    Presents the author's opinion on standards and assessment of student learning in the United States. How discontent with school systems is not a new phenomenon; The limitations of assessment; Questions education leaders and policy makers should be asking themselves; What school leaders should...

  • The Elementary School Success Profile Model of Assessment and Prevention: Balancing Effective Practice Standards and Feasibility. Bowen, Natasha K.; Powers, Joelle D. // School Social Work Journal;Spring2011, Vol. 35 Issue 2, p1 

    Evidence-based practice and data-driven decision making (DDDM) are two approaches to accountability that have been promoted in the school literature. In spite of the push to promote these approaches in schools, barriers to their widespread, appropriate, and effective use have limited their...

  • The Politics of High-Stakes Testing. Casbarro, Joseph // Education Digest;Feb2005, Vol. 70 Issue 6, p20 

    Focuses on the standardized test approach administered by the U.S. government to students at designated grade levels. Areas in which reality of high-stakes testing has created a debate over how the government judge schools; Actions to be taken by educators to make high-stakes tests the sole...

  • THE CLASSROOM IMPACT OF HIGH-STRESS TESTING. PERREAULT, DR. GEORGE // Education;Summer2000, Vol. 120 Issue 4, p705 

    Much of the conversation about educational reform has been grounded in a conservative perspective, but it is unclear if teachers and principals have accepted that ideology. Interviews were conducted with eight focus groups of teachers, divided between those successful on standardized,...

  • LETTERS. Werstler, Richard E.; Fege, Arnold F.; Cornish, Ed; Lachowicz, Joseph; Batory, Joe // School Administrator;May2008, Vol. 65 Issue 5, p4 

    Several letters to the editor are presented in response to articles in previous issues including "Futuristics in K-12 Classrooms," by Art Shostak and "What Knowledge Has the Most Worth?" by Yong Zhao in the February 2008 issue, and "Endangering Democracy With High Stakes Testing," by Michael...

  • Study Points Out That Only Five States Reward Successful Schools And Punish Low-Performers.  // Jet;01/25/99, Vol. 95 Issue 8, p22 

    Reports that only five states have policies in place which reward successful schools and punish low performers. Brief information on policies in Indiana, Maryland, New Mexico, North Carolina and Texas; Survey conducted by `Education Week'; Identification of steps states must take to hold...


Read the Article


Sign out of this library

Other Topics