TITLE

DISCUSSIONS - The Scope, Functions, and Limitations of University Workers' Education Programs

AUTHOR(S)
Ulriksson, Vidkunn
PUB. DATE
January 1952
SOURCE
Industrial & Labor Relations Review;Jan52, Vol. 5 Issue 2, p221
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article discusses the scope, functions, and limitations of university workers' education programs. These programs probably cannot get by with working in the agitational and organizational area of labor unions because of the makeup of university governing boards and the general political climate. In addition, universities can and should operate in the area of the union's bargaining functions. This field includes such subjects as labor history, union administration, collective bargaining, labor laws and legislation, the psychology of labor-management relations, and the role of the union members as citizens.
ACCESSION #
6445383

 

Related Articles

  • Auflösung des Liberalisierungsdilemmas. Arbeitsbeziehungen in Mittelosteuropa im Kontext des EU-Beitritts. Bluhm, Katharina // Berliner Journal für Soziologie;2006, Vol. 16 Issue 2, p173 

    Scholars and unionists often claim an "excessive" flexibility and unilateral manager power in the labor relations system of Central Eastern Europe, while others observe „insufficient“ flexibility and etatism. Beyond mere political reasoning the article provides an explanation for...

  • THE UNION SHOP: A LEGITIMATE FORM OF COERCION IN A FREE-MARKET ECONOMY. Pulsipher, Allan G. // Industrial & Labor Relations Review;Jul66, Vol. 19 Issue 4, p529 

    This article examines the issue of coercive union membership in the U.S. The main assumption of collective bargaining is that by entering into a coalition with other workers the expected return from bargaining of the individual worker will be increased. Union bargaining services may be...

  • UNION/NONUNION DIFFERENTIALS: MEMBERSHIP OR COVERAGE. Jones, Ethel B. // Journal of Human Resources;Spring82, Vol. 17 Issue 2, p276 

    The article examines the union and nonunion differentials for covered and noncovered members from collective bargaining in the U.S. Findings suggests, but does not verify, that designation by membership rather than coverage produces a lower estimate of the union/nonunion differential. For all of...

  • Bargaining Fee versus Union Shop. Spielmans, John V. // Industrial & Labor Relations Review;Jul57, Vol. 10 Issue 4, p609 

    The continuing controversy over the union shop is usually phrased in terms of compulsory versus voluntary union membership. In this article, a further distinction is made between the payments now required of union members and the payment which a union may rightfully claim for those services...

  • What Do Unions Do? A Cross-National Reexamination of the Relationship between Unionization and Job Satisfaction. Hipp, Lena; Givan, Rebecca Kolins // Social Forces;Sep2015, Vol. 94 Issue 1, p349 

    What is the relationship between unionization and job satisfaction? Despite a great deal of research over several decades, the answer to this question is still uncertain. In contrast to earlier work, which analyzed mostly data from individual companies or countries, we examine the association...

  • A Win-Win Approach to Collective Bargaining: The Past Model. Barrett, Jerome T. // Labor Law Journal;Jan90, Vol. 41 Issue 1, p41 

    The article describes win-win bargaining, a new approach to collective bargaining in the United States. The approach comprises a set of principles, assumptions, steps and techniques that can be used by bargaining teams to gain positive results for both parties. The principles of the win-win...

  • Study Portrays Need for Tougher Remedies for Bargaining Refusals.  // Labor Law Journal;Nov66, Vol. 17 Issue 11, p703 

    This article focuses on a study that leads to the conclusion that many employers violate the principles of collective bargaining because they do not like the idea of negotiation with unions. On the basis of that study, a recommendation is offered that the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB)...

  • Labor-management cooperation: Is management ready? Herrnstadt, Owen E. // Labor Law Journal;Oct95, Vol. 46 Issue 10, p636 

    Mutual trust and respect between labor and management are required before most workplace cooperation programs can be successful. Building trust with labor means that management must respect unions by recognizing the importance and value of the entire concept and framework of collective...

  • Collective bargaining or legal enactment: the 1999 act and union recognition. WEDDERBURN, LORD // Industrial Law Journal;Mar2000, Vol. 29 Issue 1, p1 

    Sidney and Beatrice Webb introduced a dichotomy in 1897: 'The Method of Enactment and the Method of Collective Bargaining'. They predicted the eventual hegemony of Enactment. How does the Employment Relations Act 1999 look in that framework, or others such as Juridification, Regulation,...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics