TITLE

G.M.S. Committee—Purchase of Added Years; Family Planning Services; Lord Halsbury and the Review Body

PUB. DATE
October 1974
SOURCE
British Medical Journal;10/26/1974, Vol. 4 Issue 5938, p243
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
No abstract available.
ACCESSION #
64112111

 

Related Articles

  • Incomes survey makes mockery of pay system.  // GP: General Practitioner;11/4/2002, p29 

    Focuses on the survey by Review Body on income and pay systems of general practitioners for the financial year 2001. Percentage rise in General Medical Services (GMS) profits in South east England; Distribution of figures between GMS and Primary Medical Service practices; Average profit per GMS...

  • PMS should meet same quality goals.  // GP: General Practitioner;11/17/2003, p6 

    Despite not having negotiating rights for Personal Medical Services (PMS) general practitioner (GP), the British Medical Association evidence to the Review Body includes comments on the quality framework for these practices. The submission expresses the GPC concern over the DoH plan for PMS GPs...

  • Pay rise decision 'due in February'. Sands, Judy // GP: General Practitioner;11/30/2007, p19 

    The article reports that the decision on any income rise is being anxiously awaited by general practitioners of Great Britain from Review Body. It is stated that after two years of a pay freeze and minimal change to the quality framework, most GPs are looking for the outcome of both General...

  • GPC to submit case for inflationary rise.  // GP: General Practitioner;9/29/2006, p3 

    The article reports on the decision of the General Practitioners Committee to ask its Review Body to rule on an inflationary pay rise while adding a core change in the income of General Practitioners in Great Britain. As per the contract deal signed with the General Medical Council (GMS) in the...

  • Distribution plan for 0.8% rise settled. Bostock, Nick; Sell, Susie // GP: General Practitioner;5/7/2010, p7 

    The article offers information on the increase in the distribution plan by 0.8 percent for general medical service (GMS). It states that GMS practices will receive more than 1 percent from 2010-2011 pay deal. It mentions that General Practitioners Committee (GPC) would not confirm as GP went to...

  • Review Body GMS ruling next month.  // GP: General Practitioner;1/19/2007, p16 

    The article presents information on the decision of the Review Body for General Medical Services (GMS) to make recommendations on general practitioners' pay in Great Britain. According to the British Department of Health, the Review Body's role in setting GMS pay ceased when the new contract...

  • Abroad.  // National Review Bulletin;3/14/1967, Vol. 19 Issue 10, p7 

    The article offers global news briefs related to politics. The British government has decided that the pound shall go decimal, despite disputes over recommendations by Lord Halsbury's Decimalization Committee. London, England is committed towards withdrawing troops and equipment from its Aden...

  • IT suppliers await contract details.  // GP: General Practitioner;2/10/2003, p57 

    Focuses on views of software suppliers to primary care regarding crises in computer equipment to support general practitioners for implementing General Medical Services (GMS) contract for the year 2003 in Great Britain. Plans of software suppliers to help their clients; Efforts undertaken by...

  • UK Database.  // Medeconomics;Jul2003, Vol. 24 Issue 7, p42 

    The article presents data related to general medical services (GMS) profits earned by clients of specialist medical accountants Ramsay Brown & Partners during the year March 31 2001 to March 31 2002 in Great Britain. The figures have been adjusted to exclude profit or loss on cost/notional rent...

  • Opinion: Ballot box.  // GP: General Practitioner;9/5/2012, p18 

    The article presents the results of a recent opinion poll on whether the decision to block the Doctors' and Dentists' Review Body ( DDRB) from advising on the funding of General Medical Services (GMS) unfair to general practitioners (GPs).

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics