TITLE

Editorial: Drivers and deterrents

PUB. DATE
June 1974
SOURCE
British Medical Journal;6/22/1974, Vol. 2 Issue 5920, p624
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
No abstract available.
ACCESSION #
64110799

 

Related Articles

  • Morality of nuclear deterrence.  // Commonweal;5/8/87, Vol. 114 Issue 9, p259 

    Editorial. The search for a moral deterrent to nuclear weapons and war is not doomed to self-contradiction but is morally preferable to the immediate and complete rejection of nuclear deterrence. Given the realities of world politics, some form of deterrence is necessary.

  • Speaking the same language.  // ENR: Engineering News-Record;9/26/94, Vol. 233 Issue 13, p70 

    Editorial. Comments on the non-deterrence of culture handicaps at the international waste technology conference in Bordeaux, France.

  • Fast and Furious. Mills, Richard // Engineer (00137758);9/26/2003, Vol. 292 Issue 7636, p20 

    Comments on an editorial about the responsibility of the driver of a vehicle.

  • `We never dreamed...'. Geiger, Keith W. // Airpower Journal;Winter90, Vol. 4 Issue 4, p2 

    Editorial. Comments on the reality and truth behind wars. Operation Desert Shield; Reason for the existence of a military force; Military slogans; Concepts of deterrence theory; Deprivation and discomfort.

  • Death penalty debates continue.  // America;5/10/1997, Vol. 176 Issue 16, p3 

    Editorial. Discusses the imposition of death penalty in the United States. Why the death penalty is not deterrent to crimes; Historical background on the imposition of capital punishment in the United States.

  • Impact of formal and informal deterrents on driving behavior. Yamamura, Eiji // Journal of Socio-Economics;Dec2008, Vol. 37 Issue 6, p2505 

    Abstract: This paper explores, using panel data of traffic accidents in Japan, how formal and informal deterrence affect driving manners. I found through fixed effects and fixed effects 2SLS estimations that formal deterrents, such as police, cause drivers to drive attentively but that this...

  • Killing is no way to stop murder. R.E.B. // U.S. Catholic;Apr90, Vol. 55 Issue 4, p2 

    Editorial. Argues against the use of the death penalty. Refutes claims that the death penalty is a deterrent; Discrimination against the poor in United States capital punishment; Why the death penalty is unjust.

  • The case against capital punishment.  // America;11/12/1988, Vol. 159 Issue 14, p363 

    Editorial. Opposes capital punishment for reasons of cruelty, unconstitutionality, and inability to establish certain guilt. Suggests that capital punishment is not an effective crime deterrent, and that other, more humane tactics must be explored.

  • Red alert.  // Christian Science Monitor;7/27/98, Vol. 90 Issue 169, p12 

    Editorial. States that surveillance cameras at traffic lights should be put into widespread use. Accidents caused by driving through red traffic lights; Use of these cameras in California; Evidence that they are an effective deterrent.

  • Editorial. Fetter, Marilyn S. // MEDSURG Nursing;Oct2001, Vol. 10 Issue 5, p231 

    Editorial. Comments on the limitations of regulatory and legal efforts on the reduction of health care errors. Investigation of the dimensions of the problem of medical mistakes; Example of gross professional misconduct of physicians; Emphasis on punishment as a deterrent to bad care.

Share

Read the Article

Other Topics