Does Investing in Employees Affect Firm Debt Levels?

Qiu, Xiaodong; Largay III, James A.
August 2011
Academy of Management Perspectives;Aug2011, Vol. 25 Issue 3, p76
Academic Journal
A review is presented of the article "Employee treatment and firm leverage: A test of the stakeholder theory of capital structure," by Kee-Hong Bae, Jun-Koo Kang and Jin Wang, published in a 2011 issue of "Journal of Financial Economics."


Related Articles

  • The Stockholder – A Lesson for Business Ethics from Bioethics? Hardwig, John // Journal of Business Ethics;Feb2010, Vol. 91 Issue 3, p329 

    Business ethics – both stockholder and stakeholder theories – makes the same mistake as the one made by the traditional ethics of medicine. The traditional ethics of medicine was a teleological ethics predicated on the assumption that the goal of medicine was to prolong life and...

  • Stakeholder Valuing: A Process for Identifying the Interrelationships between Firm and Stakeholder Attributes. Carlon, Donna M.; Downs, Alexis // Administrative Sciences (2076-3387);Jun2014, Vol. 4 Issue 2, p137 

    As firms are creating and recreating themselves as stakeholder corporations, tensions mount between a firm's fiduciary duties to its shareholders and the broader responsibilities inherent in a stakeholder focus. Firms have employed several techniques to help resolve this tension with limited...

  • Gioia's Reply to Jones and Wicks. Gioia, Dennis A. // Academy of Management Review;Oct99, Vol. 24 Issue 4, p624 

    The author responds to T. M. Jones and A. C. Wicks' reactions after the initial criticism of their article "Convergent Stakeholder Theory." The author points out three major points of disagreement with Jones and Wicks' commentary on his original piece, including their academic judgments of his...

  • A Note on Stakeholder Theory and Risk: Implications for Corporate Cash Holdings and Dividend Policy. Speckbacher, Gerhard; Wentges, Paul // Frontiers in Finance & Economics;2009, Vol. 6 Issue 1, p51 

    According to Zingales (1999), corporate governance is defined as the complex set of constraints that shape the ex-post bargaining over the quasi-rents generated by a firm. This paper argues that corporate cash holdings and dividend policy can be used as soft constraints in this regard in order...

  • THE INFLUENCE OF STAKEHOLDER THEORY UPON THE CAPITAL STRUCTURE. Corduneanu, Carmen; Iovu, Laura // Megatrend Review;2009, Vol. 6 Issue 2, p147 

    The stakeholder theory is a new approach linked with the capital structure of the company. According to this theory, the companies must assume their financial decisions not only in front of the equity holders, but also in front of the other stakeholders (suppliers, customers, competition,...

  • Erratum to: Scandinavian Cooperative Advantage: The Theory and Practice of Stakeholder Engagement in Scandinavia. Strand, Robert; Freeman, R. // Journal of Business Ethics;Mar2015, Vol. 127 Issue 1, p87 

    A correction to the article "Scandinavian Cooperative Advantage: The Theory and Practice of Stakeholder Engagement in Scandinavia" which was published online on November 9, 2013 is presented.

  • Stakeholder Management and Organizational Wealth. Preston, Lee E.; Donaldson, Thomas // Academy of Management Review;Oct99, Vol. 24 Issue 4, p619 

    The article comments on the articles "The Relational View: Cooperative Strategy and Sources of Interorganizational Competitive Advantage," by J. H. Dyer and H. Singh and "Convergent Stakeholder Theory," by T. M. Jones and A. C. Wicks. The authors of these two articles argue that organizational...

  • Letter to AMR Regarding "Convergent Stakeholder Theory". Jones, Thomas M.; Wicks, Andrew C. // Academy of Management Review;Oct99, Vol. 24 Issue 4, p621 

    The article presents a response to comments made by authors L. K. Treviño, G. R. Weaver and D. A. Gioia on the article "Convergent Stakeholder Theory," by T. M. Jones and A. C. Wicks. Their first point of disagreement comes from Treviño and Weaver's argument that stakeholder theory is not...

  • Trevino and Weaver's Reply to Jones and Wicks. Treviño, Linda Klebe; Weaver, Gary R. // Academy of Management Review;Oct99, Vol. 24 Issue 4, p623 

    The article presents a rebuttal to "Convergent Stakeholder Theory," by T. M. Jones and A. C. Wicks. The authors explain their reasoning behind suggesting their own phrase to represent the more commonly used "stakeholder theory." This alternative phrase was suggested because the word "theory"...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics