TITLE

Social and Cultural Influences on Management for Carbon Sequestration on US Family Forestlands: A Literature Synthesis

AUTHOR(S)
Paige Fischer, A.; Charnley, Susan
PUB. DATE
January 2010
SOURCE
International Journal of Forestry Research;2010, p1
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Nonindustrial private-or "family"-forests hold great potential for sequestering carbon and have received much attention in discussions about forestry-based climate change mitigation. However, little is known about social and cultural influences on owners' willingness to manage for carbon and respond to policies designed to encourage carbon-oriented management. We review the published literature to examine how family forest owners' values, ecological knowledge, risk perceptions, and forest management and policy preferences may affect their interest in managing for carbon sequestration. We find that although family forest owners may not be particularly motivated to mitigate climate change, their forest management values and practices compliment many carbon-oriented management strategies. However, the strong value owners place on privacy and autonomy, and the weak importance many place on financial reward, may inhibit participation in policies and programs that incentivize carbonoriented management. These findings also have implications for policy efforts to encourage management for other ecological values besides carbon sequestration on family forestlands.
ACCESSION #
63487024

 

Related Articles

  • Reforestation the right response.  // PPI: Pulp & Paper International;Feb2009, Vol. 51 Issue 2, p13 

    The article reports on A3P's acknowledgement on the Australian government's CPRS White Paper which aims to allow reforestation for climate change mitigation. A3P recognizes the government's realization on the role of carbon stored in forests in mitigating climate change. On the other hand, the...

  • Initial public reactions to carbon capture and storage (CCS): differentiating general and local views. Terwel, Bart W.; Daamen, Dancker D.L. // Climate Policy (Earthscan);2012, Vol. 12 Issue 3, p288 

    Carbon capture and storage (CCS) is considered a potential climate change mitigation option, but public opposition may hamper its implementation. A quasi-experimental approach is used to examine whether �not in my back yard� (NIMBY) sentiments can be anticipated at the initial stage...

  • No Complacency. Khan, Shaheena; Khan, Irshad // Economic & Political Weekly;6/28/2014, Vol. 49 Issue 26/27, p4 

    A letter to the editor is presented in response to the article "Climate Change, Forest Carbon Sequestration and REDD Plus: The Context of India"by P. J. Dilip Kumar in the May 24, 2014 issue.

  • Value capture.  // Utility Week;7/22/2011, p6 

    The article reports that the Zero Emissions Platform advisory group has urged the government to draft policies to support the carbon capture, storage, and transportation infrastructure to address climate change in Great Britain.

  • The Quest to Sequester. Fairley, Peter // Technology Review;Sep/Oct2010, Vol. 113 Issue 5, p92 

    The article reports that carbon sequestration is one of the ways of capturing carbon dioxide released by burning without promoting catastrophic climate change in the U.S.

  • Carbon burial. Marshall, Michael // New Scientist;12/17/2011, Vol. 212 Issue 2843, p4 

    The article reports on the success of carbon capture and storage (CCS) projects in Canada and Australia, which buried carbon dioxide in the Earth to slow climate change.

  • Lack of CCS strategy risks climate targets. T. G. // Utility Week;2/12/2016, p23 

    The article reports that a report by the Energy and Climate Change Committee has warned that ministers need to commit a clear strategy for carbon capture and storage (CCS) or risk missing the climate change targets agreed at the Paris COP21 summit.

  • State of the World's Forests 2012. Ball, Jim // CFA Newsletter;Dec2012, Issue 59, p12 

    The article discusses the report entitled "State of the World's Forests 2012" (SOFO) from the Committee on Forestry (COFO), the Forestry Department of Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) of the United Nations. It states that SOFO aims to report the progress for sustainable forest management...

  • A Tank Bromeliad Favors Spider Presence in a Neotropical Inundated Forest. Hénaut, Yann; Corbara, Bruno; Pélozuelo, Laurent; Azémar, Frédéric; Céréghino, Régis; Herault, Bruno; Dejean, Alain // PLoS ONE;Dec2014, Vol. 9 Issue 12, p1 

    Tank bromeliads are good models for understanding how climate change may affect biotic associations. We studied the relationships between spiders, the epiphytic tank bromeliad, Aechmea bracteata, and its associated ants in an inundated forest in Quintana Roo, Mexico, during a drought period...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics