TITLE

More Cuts Coming

AUTHOR(S)
Polmar, Norman
PUB. DATE
July 2011
SOURCE
U.S. Naval Institute Proceedings;Jul2011, Vol. 137 Issue 7, p86
SOURCE TYPE
Conference Proceeding
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article reports that the U.S. House Appropriations Committee has reduced the fiscal year 2012 Department of Defense budget by some 17 billion dollars, when compared to 2011 defense budget. It mentions that the budget cuts do not include military construction, which might also reduced. It informs that these cuts will cause major changes in Navy programs and ships including the construction of the nuclear-propelled carrier Gerald R. Ford (CVN-78), littoral combat ship (LCS), and submarines.
ACCESSION #
63305402

 

Related Articles

  • House Appropriators Cut AMRAAM Quantities, Funding From Navy, Air Force Coffers.  // Space & Missile Defense Report;7/4/2011, Vol. 12 Issue 14, p2 

    The article reports that the U.S. House Appropriations Committee has deducted 400 million dollars from the defense spending bill for the fiscal year 2012. It is mentioned that the deductions have been made from the U.S. Navy's and Air Force's weapons purchase request for the Advanced Medium...

  • More Than 40 House Members Urge HAC Support of Army JTRS HMS, WIN-T Efforts. Roosevelt, Ann // Defense Daily;11/1/2011, Vol. 252 Issue 23, p8 

    The article informs on the support of 46 U.S. Congress' House members to the U.S. Army's Joint Tactical Radio System Handheld Manpack Small Form Factor (JTRS HMS) and Warfighter Information Network-Tactical (WIN-T) programs against the proposed defense budget cuts. The members have written to...

  • Top Budget-Minded Lawmaker Receptive To EFV, F-35 Cuts. Rutherford, Emelie // Defense Daily;1/7/2011, Vol. 249 Issue 4, p1 

    The article presents information on the proposal of Robert Gates, U.S. Defense Secretary, for defense budget cuts. The proposed cuts are related to the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter and an amphibious vehicle, and have early support of key lawmakers but criticized by others. C. W. Young, lawmaker,...

  • Time to Think TACTICALLY. Reynolds, Ben // U.S. Naval Institute Proceedings;Sep2013, Vol. 139 Issue 9, p28 

    The article discusses the need of renewed focus on maritime tactics by the U.S. Navy meet its objectives even in current scenario of budget cut. It is informed that the Navy should focus its resources on the maritime sea-control missions of antisubmarine warfare (ASW), anti-surface warfare...

  • Panel Chair Resists Defense Cuts In Light of Navy Readiness Concerns. Rutherford, Emelie // Defense Daily;7/12/2011, Vol. 251 Issue 8, p8 

    The article reports on the opposition of U.S. Representative Randy Forbes about the call to reduce defense budget despite concerns on the readiness of the nation's Navy. It mentions the contrast between the country's Navy readiness status due to decreased funding and the increasing military...

  • Intelligence budgets.  // Editor & Publisher;11/12/94, Vol. 127 Issue 46, p6 

    Comments on the blunder committed by the US House Defense Appropriations subcommittee when it published the defense budget for 1995. Government practice not to allow publication of budgets of numerous agencies for reason of national security; Advocacy for the disclosure of public funds'...

  • House Appropriations Bill Advances with $88 Billion in OCO Intact. Insinna, Valerie // Defense Daily;6/3/2015, p2 

    The article reports on the plan of the U.S. House Appropriations Committee to move forward its defense appropriations bill on June 3, 2015.

  • CNO Outlines Shipbuilding, Aircraft Cuts In Fiscal '14. McCarthy, Mike // Defense Daily;9/5/2013, p11 

    The article reports on a statement by Chief of Naval Operations Admiral Jonathan Greenert on the need of the Navy to cut its ship and aircraft procurement plans in fiscal 2014 unless there is a budget relief from the U.S. Congress. According to Greenert, the Navy may be forced to eliminate one...

  • The Necessity of Dominant American Sea Power. McGrath, Bryan G. // U.S. Naval Institute Proceedings;Jan2011, Vol. 137 Issue 1, p48 

    In this article, the author discusses the need for U.S. naval superiority in the world for its own security and prosperity. He criticizes the government's plan to cut the defense budget and reduce the fleet of naval soldiers and warships. He points out China, Russia and Iran as potential threats...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics