TITLE

How to write high-quality questions for a high-stakes examination

AUTHOR(S)
Twort, Charles; Mucklow, John
PUB. DATE
June 2011
SOURCE
Clinical Medicine;Jun2011, Vol. 11 Issue 3, p227
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Both the MRCP(UK) written examinations and the specialty certificate examinations (SCEs) use single-best-answer questions to assess the knowledge and problem-solving skills of physicians in training. Since 1999, specialists and senior trainees have created large banks of questions for these examinations that cover the relevant curricula. Question-writing workshops provide detailed guidance on the design of questions that discriminate between candidates of differing ability, in a format and a style that aid speed reading and comprehension. Each question drafted is subjected to face-to-face peer review and subsequent stages of academic scrutiny before reaching the question bank, and later during the exacting processes of question selection and standard setting. Feedback to question writers at every level of scrutiny helps to support the development of question-writing competence, and the analysis of individual question performance provides some insight into optimal question design.
ACCESSION #
63243992

 

Related Articles

  • CME SELF TEST. Chang, Cindy // Physician & Sportsmedicine;May2004, Vol. 32 Issue 5, p47 

    This article presents a test, related to medical education. This continuing medical education activity was planned and produced in accordance with the Essential Areas and Policies of the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME). The American College of Sports Medicine...

  • Development and implementation of the specialty certificate examinations. Mucklow, John // Clinical Medicine;Jun2011, Vol. 11 Issue 3, p235 

    Following successful pilots in 2006, knowledgebased assessments for those engaged in specialty training have been developed and implemented in 11 medical specialties, by the Federation of Royal Colleges of Physicians in partnership with the specialist societies. Over 400 physicians have been...

  • Education: MRCGP - Revising for the AKT and CSA. Asong, Leke // GP: General Practitioner;9/3/2010, p44 

    The article presents information on preparing for the applied knowledge test (AKT) and clinical skills assessment (CSA) by general practitioners (GPs) in Great Britain. It is suggested that time management as well as organisation skills are essential and most important while preparing for the...

  • Self-Assessment Test for CME Credit.  // Ophthalmology Times;3/15/2004 Supplement 2, Vol. 29, p10 

    The Institute for Medical Studies (IMS) is accredited by the ACCME to provide continuing medical education for physicians. IMS designates this educational activity for a maximum of 1.0 hour in category 1 credit toward the AMA Physicians Recognition Award. To receive CME credit the participant...

  • An argument-based approach to the validation of UHTRUST: can we measure how recent graduates can be trusted with unfamiliar tasks? Wijnen-Meijer, M.; Van der Schaaf, M.; Booij, E.; Harendza, S.; Boscardin, C.; Van Wijngaarden, J.; Ten Cate, Th. J. // Advances in Health Sciences Education;Dec2013, Vol. 18 Issue 5, p1009 

    There is a need for valid methods to assess the readiness for clinical practice of medical graduates. This study evaluates the validity of Utrecht Hamburg Trainee Responsibility for Unfamiliar Situations Test (UHTRUST), an authentic simulation procedure to assess whether medical trainees are...

  • Humanizing the MCAT. Robeznieks, Andis // Modern Healthcare;11/21/2011, Vol. 41 Issue 47, p32 

    The article focuses on the proposed revision of Medical College Admission Test (MCAT) in the U.S. It notes that the proposed MCAT changes follows the vision of having doctors in the workforce who possess extensive knowledge in biochemistry, behavioral and social sciences and skills in critical...

  • Shifting Approaches for Evaluation of Resident Performance: From Competencies to Milestones. Logio, Lia S // JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association;12/6/2016, Vol. 316 Issue 21, p2197 

    No abstract available.

  • Performance at MRCP(UK): when should trainees sit examinations? Pinheiro-Torres, C.; Tang, P.; Dacre, J. // Clinical Medicine;Apr2013, Vol. 13 Issue 2, p166 

    This paper analyses candidate performance in the three components of the MRCP(UK) examination to establish when they are most likely to pass. Using data from the 2010 and 2011 MRCP(UK) examinations, pass rates of candidates who gained their primary medical qualification (PMQ) in 2005 or later...

  • Changing PACES: developments to the examination in 2009. Elder, Andrew; McAlpine, Lawrence; Bateman, Nigel; Dacre, Jane; Kopelman, Peter; McManus, Chris // Clinical Medicine;Jun2011, Vol. 11 Issue 3, p231 

    As a consequence of change in medical, educational and regulatory practice, MRCP(UK) successfully modified the international PACES examination in 2009. This brief paper explains the rationale for change and summarises the development and implementation process.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics