TITLE

Safe and Sorry?

AUTHOR(S)
Thompson, Greg
PUB. DATE
August 2011
SOURCE
Imaging Economics;Aug2011, Vol. 24 Issue 7, p22
SOURCE TYPE
Trade Publication
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article focuses on the impact of incidental findings or incidentalomas by radiologists. It says that incidental findings can lead to unnecessary testing, expense, and pain for patients and direct radiologists into jeopardy for a lawsuit. Doctor Leonard Berlin notes that if there is reasonable conduct which is significantly abnormal in terms of standard of care should be mentioned. Meanwhile, a white paper regarding incidental findings on abdominal computed tomography (CT) is discussed.
ACCESSION #
63157644

 

Related Articles

  • Risky Business? Valenza, Tor // Imaging Economics;Apr2009, Vol. 22 Issue 3, p20 

    The article discusses issues and business risks faced by radiologists from lawsuits resulting from malpractice in reading mammographic studies. It provides considerations on the state of malpractice in mammography in the U.S., and suggests strategies of minimizing risks from lawsuits, along with...

  • Unless told otherwise, patients can assume that physicians work for the hospital. Delaney, Blake J. // Healthcare Risk Management;Apr2007 Supplement, p1 

    The article presents a court case wherein a woman sued a certain hospital for the misdiagnosis committed by its radiologist.

  • Practice Management Q&A.  // Medical Economics;11/2/2007, Vol. 84 Issue 21, p74 

    The article presents questions and answers related to medical practice, which include a lawsuit for keeping a patient waiting, policy on taking home paper charts of patients, and billings and collections information for physician assistant.

  • Heart Screening Test Deemed To Be Health Care Service. Herbert, David L. // Exercise Standards & Malpractice Reporter;Oct2011, Vol. 25 Issue 5, p69 

    The article discusses a court case from Texas, where court considered that heart screening test involves health care services, while hearing a case from plaintiff claiming against a health screening service provider. As stated, the decision was made on the basis of the nature of the screening...

  • Improved vigilance could lessen suits.  // Medical Economics;11/3/2006, Vol. 83 Issue 21, p22 

    The article discusses a study which focuses on the avoidance of malpractice suits if physicians paid closer attention to basic medical practice. Nearly three-fifths of the 307 closed malpractice claims analyzed involved diagnostic errors that harmed patients. The most common errors involved...

  • LITIGATION & COURT RULINGS.  // Sports Medicine Standards & Malpractice Reporter;Jan2010, Vol. 22 Issue 1, p16 

    The article discusses a court case wherein the plaintiff alleged negligence in performing an inadequate computed tomography (CT) scan, leading to the failure of physicians to diagnose her hernia. The plaintiff passed through a chest x-ray and an abdominal CT in Methodist Hospital in Chicago,...

  • Medical litigation faces British revolution. Dyer, Clare // BMJ: British Medical Journal (International Edition);2/10/96, Vol. 312 Issue 7027, p330 

    Reports on the revolution of medical litigation in Great Britain. Overhauling of the civil justice system.

  • Failure to discover that autistic child swallowed foreign object leads to death and $1 million verdict in Illinois. Gatto, Jon T.; Delaney, Blake J. // Healthcare Risk Management;Feb2008, Vol. 30 Issue 2, Special section p1 

    The article reports on the court's decision on the lawsuit filed by the parent of an autistic girl who died due to the neglect of radiologist to trasmit the report to the pediatrician in Ohio.

  • Gregg v Scott: the lost chance of 'a loss of a chance'. Cridland, Simon // Clinical Risk;Jul2005, Vol. 11 Issue 4, p138 

    The article discusses the decision of the House of Lords in the Gregg versus Scott case. It considers the lordships' reasoning and what claims may still be available to the claimant who cannot prove that but for the negligence, he would have been uninjured. The general practitioner negligently...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics