TITLE

Naturalized truth and Plantinga's evolutionary argument against naturalism

AUTHOR(S)
Feng Ye
PUB. DATE
August 2011
SOURCE
International Journal for Philosophy of Religion;Aug2011, Vol. 70 Issue 1, p27
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
There are three major theses in Plantinga's latest version of his evolutionary argument against naturalism. (1) Given materialism, the conditional probability of the reliability of human cognitive mechanisms produced by evolution is low; (2) the same conditional probability given reductive or non-reductive materialism is still low; (3) the most popular naturalistic theories of content and truth are not admissible for naturalism. I argue that Plantinga's argument for (1) presupposes an anti-materialistic conception of content, and it therefore begs the question against materialism. To argue for (2), Plantinga claims that the adaptiveness of a belief is indifferent to its truth. I argue that this claim is unsupported unless it again assumes an anti-materialistic conception of content and truth. I further argue that Plantinga's argument for (3) is not successful either, because an improved version of teleosemantics can meet his criticisms. Moreover, this version of teleosemantics implies that the truth of a belief is (probabilistically) positively related to its adaptiveness, at least for simple beliefs about physical objects in human environments. This directly challenges Plantinga's claim that adaptiveness is indifferent to truth.
ACCESSION #
63040900

 

Related Articles

  • NOA'S ARK - FINE FOR REALISM. Musgrave, Alan // Philosophical Quarterly;Oct89, Vol. 39 Issue 157, p383 

    The article discusses scientific realism in the context of the Natural Ontological Attitude. Acceptance of results of science can be done in the same way as the evidence of senses is true. An instrumentalist and a positivist would believe in the falsity of science because of the lack of...

  • Anti-Realist Truth and Truth-Recognition. Usberti, Gabriele // Topoi;Apr2012, Vol. 31 Issue 1, p37 

    I will be concerned with the following question: are there compelling arguments for postulating a distinction between the truth of a statement and the recognition of its truth, when truth is conceived along the lines of a suitable generalization of the intuitionistic idea that it should be...

  • Procedural Aspects of Tax Fairness: A Content Analysis of Canadian Tax Jurisprudence. Farrar, Jonathan M.; Donnelly, Maureen E.; Dhaliwal, Sonia B. // ATA Journal of Legal Tax Research;2013, Vol. 11 Issue 2, p21 

    We undertake a directed content analysis of Canadian tax jurisprudence to analyze procedural, interpersonal, and informational fairness, and their respective criteria, in the tax context. To facilitate our analysis, we apply Colquitt's (2001) theoretical framework of fairness. Consistent with...

  • Underdetermination, Holism and the Theory/Data Distinction. Okasha, S. // Philosophical Quarterly;Jul2002, Vol. 52 Issue 208, p303 

    I examine the argument that scientific theories are typically ‘underdetermined’ by the data, an argument which has often been used to combat scientific realism. I deal with two objections to the underdetermination argument: (i) that the argument conflicts with the holistic nature of...

  • Promiscuous realism. Wilson, Robert A. // British Journal for the Philosophy of Science;Jun96, Vol. 47 Issue 2, p303 

    Discusses John Dupre's defense of promiscuous realism in part one of his book `The Disorder of Things: Metaphysical Foundations of the Disunity of Science.' Promiscuous realism and common sense; Pluralism and biological taxonomy; Challenge to essentialist and unificationist views about natural...

  • Accommodational Plasticity in Organizational Science: Impact of Hypothesis Framing on Effect Size. Bosco, Frank A.; Field, James G.; Pierce, Charles A. // Academy of Management Annual Meeting Proceedings;2012, Vol. 2012 Issue 1, p1 

    Accommodational plasticity represents research environment characteristics that facilitate a posteriori hypothesizing, or building accommodating hypotheses after observations are made rather than before. Philosophers of science argue that a posteriori (accommodated) hypotheses constrict...

  • When Empirical Success Implies Theoretical Reference: A Structural Correspondence Theorem. Schurz, Gerhard // British Journal for the Philosophy of Science;Mar2009, Vol. 60 Issue 1, p101 

    Starting from a brief recapitulation of the contemporary debate on scientific realism, this paper argues for the following thesis: Assume a theory T has been empirically successful in a domain of application A, but was superseded later on by a superior theory T*, which was likewise successful in...

  • LA VERDAD Y EL MUNDO OBJETIVO: Crítica a la epistemologización del concepto de verdad en la hermenéutica de G. Vattimo y en el pragmatismo de R. Rorty. RUEDA, B. EDUARDO A. // Universitas Philosophica;jun2006, Vol. 23 Issue 46, p129 

    This paper has been divided in three parts. In the first one, it is shown how, according to Vattimo's hermeneutics, true statements are not more than statements justified in an ideal way. In the second one, it is explained how, according to R. Rorty, true statements are not more than justified...

  • Realism or Relativism for Marketing Theory and Research: A Comment on Hunt's "Scientific Realism" Peter, J. Paul // Journal of Marketing;Apr92, Vol. 56 Issue 2, p72 

    Hunt's 1990 interpretation of scientific realism is compared with the relativistic/constructionist view previously introduced in this journal. Though some similarities are found, the two views differ most strikingly in terms of the nature of reality, the nature of truth, and the value of the...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics