TITLE

U.S. Supreme Court Issues Decision in Key Climate Change Case

PUB. DATE
July 2011
SOURCE
CoatingsTech;Jul2011, Vol. 8 Issue 7, p19
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article discusses a court case on the claim filed by Connecticut against American Electric Power Co. Inc., alleging that the contribution of carbon dioxide emissions to global warming constitutes a public nuisance. It states that the decision of the unanimous decision of the U.S. Supreme Court on the case was praised by the American Coatings Association (ACA). It mentions that the court had refused to decide on the pursuance of public nuisance claims under the state of nuisance law.
ACCESSION #
63020360

 

Related Articles

  • U.S. Supreme Court Hears Oral Arguments in AEP v. Connecticut.  // CoatingsTech;Jun2011, Vol. 8 Issue 6, p20 

    The article focuses on the amicus brief by American Coatings Association (ACA) on the public nuisance/climate change case of Connecticut v. American Electric Power Co. Inc. (AEP). It says that the amicus brief covers public nuisance law and political question doctrine in relation to the oral...

  • Nation's High Court Hears Global-Warming Arguments. Hunter, Pam // ENR: Engineering News-Record;4/25/2011, Vol. 266 Issue 12, p16 

    The article highlights the major environmental court case being heard by the U.S. Supreme Court. The issue in the case American Electric Power v. Connecticut involves the issue of whether states and individuals can sue utilities under federal common law for contributing to global warming and...

  • Supreme Climate Change Battle.  // Venulex Legal Summaries;2010 Q4, Special section p1 

    The article discusses highlights of the case American Electric Power v. Connecticut in which the U.S. Supreme Court agreed to hear a challenge to a Second Circuit decision that allows the plaintiffs to maintain a public nuisance lawsuit against energy companies with fossil-fuel-fired electric...

  • Supreme Climate Change Battle.  // Venulex Legal Summaries;2009 Q4, Special section p1 

    The article reports on the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court to agree to hear a challenge to a Second Circuit decision allowing plaintiffs to maintain a public nuisance suit against energy firms operating fossil-fuel-fired electric generating plants on December 6, 2010. The energy industry is...

  • Heating Up. TRENT, ASHLEY // InsideCounsel;Apr2011, Vol. 22 Issue 232, p18 

    The article discusses the court case Connecticut v. American Electric Power (AEP) wherein six electric power corporations were sued for allegedly contributing to global warming, to be heard by the U.S. Supreme Court in April 2011. According to plaintiffs, among environmental and personal...

  • Federal common law of nuisance can be applied to coal-burning utilities. Wojcik, Joanne // Business Insurance;9/28/2009, Vol. 43 Issue 34, p26 

    The article reports on the ruling by the Second U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New York in the case State of Connecticut et al. v. American Electric Power Co. et al., wherein the filing of a lawsuit against five U.S. coal-burning electric utilities was allowed under the federal common law of...

  • Court Limits Emissions Power to EPA. Saunders, Sarah // Human Events;6/27/2011, Vol. 67 Issue 23, p6 

    The article reports that the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled in the case of American Electric Power Co. v. Connecticut, declaring that states and local agencies do not have the power to file lawsuits in federal court to force companies to cut greenhouse gas emissions.

  • Climate Change Litigation: An Overview. Tobon, M. Camila // Environmental Litigation Committee Newsletter;Fall2012, Vol. 24 Issue 1, p15 

    The article reports on various public and private litigations brought to the U.S. courts over climate change issues against oil, energy and automobile manufacturing companies. It states that the lawsuits claim these industry's greenhouse-gas emissions constituting public nuisances. It also...

  • CONNECTICUT V. AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER CO. Gore, Nikhil V.; Tarr, Jennifer E. // Harvard Environmental Law Review;2010, Vol. 34 Issue 2, p577 

    The author discusses a court case wherein the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit announced that the federal common law of nuisance could provide the basis for court-led policy of the largest power generating firms in the U.S. He argues that such a use of federal common law in Connecticut v....

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics