High Court Gives FCC Pole Jurisdiction

January 2002
Wireless Week;1/21/2002, Vol. 8 Issue 3, p12
Trade Publication
Reports that the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that wireless telecommunication providers could pay U.S. Federal Communications Commission-limited rates to attach their equipment to utility poles. View of some justices on the Supreme Court ruling.


Related Articles

  • Supreme religious revival. Rabkin, Jeremy // American Spectator;Sep97, Vol. 30 Issue 9, p48 

    Opinion. Accusses the United States Supreme Court of `judicial activism' on its decision on different congressional rulings on religion. Implication of the court's decision on Agostini versus Felton and City of Boerne versus Flores; Provisions on the Religious Freedom Act repudiated by the...

  • Supreme Court Practices: An Amendment to 1980 Rules. Gressman, Eugene // American Bar Association Journal;Dec80, Vol. 66 Issue 12, p1530 

    Cites an amendment added by the U.S. Supreme Court to 1980 rules which requires that virtually all documents filed in the Court by or on behalf of a corporation include a listing of all parent companies, subsidiaries, and affiliates of the corporation. Aim of the listing to enable the justices...

  • State's flow control mechanism may be history.  // BioCycle;Dec97, Vol. 38 Issue 12, p24 

    Talks about the November 10, 1997 decision of the US Supreme Court on the case regarding New Jerseys' Waste Flow Control regulations. Estimated debt the counties in the state had to build incinerators, landfills and other solid waste facilities; Effect of the court's decision; Amount set aside...

  • MDL transferee court can't entertain self-assignment.  // Defense Counsel Journal;Apr98, Vol. 65 Issue 2, p293 

    Describes a civil procedure on Multidistrict Litigation (MDL) transferee court in the United States (US). Rule imposed by the US Supreme Court on US federal district court.

  • High Court Issues Stay in Long--Running Kiryas Joel Dispute. Walsh, Mark // Education Week;07/14/99, Vol. 18 Issue 42, p25 

    Discusses court cases involving the Kiryas Joel school district in New York. Ruling of the United States Supreme Court on the cases; Laws struck down by the state courts in struggling for neutrality; Details on appeal made by the Full Gospel Tabernacle; Other education-related cases. INSET:...

  • Private Rights of Action Appear Harder to Come By.  // Defense Counsel Journal;Jul2001, Vol. 68 Issue 3, p374 

    Reports on the United States Supreme Court's ruling in Alexander versus Sandoval case, which held that private individuals do not a private cause of action to enforce disparate impact rules promulgated by the Justice Department to Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Provisions of the...

  • Ruling delivers good, bad news. Taylor, Mark // Modern Healthcare;05/29/2000, Vol. 30 Issue 22, p6 

    Focuses on the rulings of the United States Supreme Court on the right of individuals to file False Claims Act suit against private hospitals but not against states. Reason behind the ruling; Impact of the ruling on private hospitals and providers; Background on the lawsuit filed by Jonathan...

  • What is free speech? Cazden, Elizabeth // Cobblestone;Jan1998, Vol. 19 Issue 1, p20 

    Details the rulings made by the U.S. Supreme Court in the First Amendment guarantee of freedom of speech. Restrictions prohibited by the First Amendment; Components of speech; Explanation about the freedom of speech.

  • Letting editors edit.  // Broadcasting & Cable;05/25/98, Vol. 128 Issue 22, p78 

    Editorial. Focuses on a United States Supreme Court ruling which stated that if the University of Virginia Charlottesville Virginia, planned a lecture series on public philosophy, the First Amendment would not require it to include all interested speakers. Pondering of the question by Chief...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics