Watchdog will get legal teeth

Boles, Corey
September 2001
Money Marketing;9/20/2001, p104
Reports that Great Britain's Financial Ombudsman can use the High Court to enforce its rule on firms regarding award payment. Penalty facing firms that fails to comply with the rule; Comments from David Cresswell, Financial Ombudsman head of communications.


Related Articles

  • High Court throws out Legal Ombudsman ruling, branding it 'irrational'. Dowell, Katy // Lawyer (Online Edition);2/12/2014, p10 

    The article reports that the High Court of Great Britain has dismissed the judgment issued by the Legal Ombudsman (LeO) against Barrister Lincoln Crawford by stating it irrational. Plaintiff Sadik Noor has complained against Crawford by stating that he didn't handled his case efficiently. The...

  • A question of class. Niekirk, Paul // Accountancy;Oct86, Vol. 98 Issue 1118, p50 

    Details the decision of the British High Court to consider what is meant by class rights in the Companies Act 1985 in relation to the case involving Cumbrian Newspaper Group Ltd. and the publishers of the newspaper 'The Cumberland & Westmoreland Herald.' Background data on the case; Conditions...

  • Professional Briefing: Law case review. Keenan, Denis // Accountancy;Apr2000, Vol. 125 Issue 1280, p102 

    Great Britain High Court has decided that the administrator's consent or the court's leave, as appropriate, is necessary to commence or continue criminal as well as civil proceedings against a company in administration. Under section 10(1) of the Insolvency Act 1986, when a petition for an...

  • Untitled. Blackmore, Nicole // Money Marketing;8/2/2007, p68 

    The article reports on the appeal of the government to the Court of Appeal regarding the ruling of the High Court on mismanagement of occupational pension schemes in Great Britain. The government filed a motion to appeal after the High Court decides that they have to abide with the decision of...

  • Confusion over roof extension ruling. Johnston, Bryan // Planning (14672073);11/29/2013, Issue 1972, p20 

    The author reflects on the June 2013 decision given by the British High Court under which roof extensions and other dormer windows should be set back from the edge of the dwelling to qualify for the class B, part I, schedule 2 of the General Permitted Development Order (GPDO) 2008.

  • Green light given for badger cull pilots.  // Meat Trades Journal;7/20/2012, p4 

    The article reports that the controversial badger cull of the British government will go ahead after judge at Great Britain's High Court has declared a legal challenge by Badger Trust in 2012.

  • Loans by a company to directors. Niekirk, Paul // Accountancy;Jun2002, Vol. 129 Issue 1306, p89 

    Subject to certain exceptions, a company whether public or private may not make a loan to a director of the company or its holding company. The British High Court, in Currencies Direct Ltd. v Ellis case filed in 2002, has considered whether the company can recover what is an illegal loan and has...

  • Regulatory powers and professional institutes. Buckett, Alan; Elliott, Graham // Accountancy;Apr96, Vol. 117 Issue 1232, p93 

    Reports on the decision of the British High Court stating that a professional institute, exercising regulatory powers over the profession it represents, is not acting in the course of furtherance of business. Need for the institute to exercise statutory powers.

  • High Court to rule whether taking charity bags is theft. Jump, Paul // Third Sector;5/18/2010, Issue 615, p5 

    The article reports on the test case to be heard by the British High Court in May 2010 in order to determine whether getting donated goods left outside charity shops are considered theft under the law in Great Britain.


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics