TITLE

Modular Prosthetic Reconstruction of Major Bone Defects of the Distal End of the Humerus

AUTHOR(S)
Funovics, Philipp T.; Schuh, Reinhard; Adams, Samuel B.; Sabeti-Aschraf, Manu; Dominkus, Martin; Kotz, Rainer I.
PUB. DATE
June 2011
SOURCE
Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, American Volume;6/1/2011, Vol. 93-A Issue 11, p1064
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Background: Bone defects of the distal end of the humerus require complex reconstructions, for which standard prostheses may be insufficient. We investigated the outcomes of distal humeral reconstruction with use of a modular prosthesis. Methods: Fifty-three elbows in fifty-two patients underwent reconstruction with a modular prosthesis (twelve total humeral replacements and forty-one distal humeral replacements) after tumor resection (thirty-eight elbows) or because of massive joint degeneration (fifteen elbows). In the tumor group, twenty-three patients (twenty-four elbows) had metastatic disease and fourteen had a primary tumor. Degenerative defects of the distal end of the humerus were caused by pseudarthrosis (six elbows), prosthetic failure (five), trauma (two), osteomyelitis (one), and supracondylar fracture (one). The mean duration of follow-up for all patients was twenty-eight months (median, thirteen months; range, one to 219 months). Results: The mean Inglis-Pellicci score in the tumor group was 84 points, and the mean Musculoskeletal Tumor Society score was 78%. Patients with total humeral reconstruction had worse scores than those with distal humeral reconstruction. Twenty-four patients died of disease at a mean of thirteen months after surgery. Local tumor control was achieved in all patients. In the revision group, the mean Inglis-Pellicci score was 76 points. The Inglis-Pellicci score was significantly better for patients in the tumor group. Eight patients (15%) had a deep periprosthetic infection, requiring amputation in one patient (2%) and prosthetic removal in two patients (4%). Four patients (8%) had the implants revised for aseptic loosening. Conclusions: Modular prostheses of the distal end of the humerus provide a stable reconstruction of the elbow with satisfactory function and disease control in patients with a tumor, but careful patient selection is required when the prostheses are used for revision surgery in patients without a tumor.
ACCESSION #
62548327

 

Related Articles

  • Modulare Tumorprothesen des Humerus. Funovics, P. T.; Dominkus, M. // Der Orthopäde;Oct2010, Vol. 39 Issue 10, p968 

    The humerus is a common location of musculoskeletal tumors. Modular prostheses of the humerus, besides APC and biological reconstructions, allow restoration of resulting bone defects. The functional outcome is determined by the extent of bone and soft tissue loss. Anatomical shoulder prostheses...

  • Treatment and outcome of malignant bone tumors of the proximal humerus: biological versus endoprosthetic reconstruction. Tang Liu; Qing Zhang; Xiaoning Guo; Xiangsheng Zhang; Zhihong Li; Xiaoyang Li // BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders;2014, Vol. 15 Issue 1, p1 

    Background The purpose of this study was to compare the outcome, complications and survival of the commonly used surgical reconstructions of the proximal humerus after intrarticular tumour resection in our hospital. Methods Between 1998 and 2010,41 consecutive proximal humeral reconstructions...

  • Allograft-Prosthesis Composite Reconstruction of the Proximal Part of the Humerus. Abdeen, Ayesha; Healey, John H. // Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, American Volume;Sep2010 Supplement, p188 

    BACKGROUND: Limb salvage following resection of a tumor in the proximal part of the humerus poses many challenges. Reconstructive options are limited because of the loss of periarticular soft-tissue stabilizers of the glenohumeral joint in addition to the loss of bone and articular cartilage....

  • An individualized approach for the implantation of a humeral prosthesis with the proper retroversion in fractures. Christoforakis, Joseph; Kontakis, George M.; Maris, Thomas; Damilakis, John; Katonis, Pavlos; Prassopoulos, Panos; Hadjipavlou, Alexander G. // Archives of Orthopaedic & Trauma Surgery;Apr2001, Vol. 121 Issue 4, p227 

    We applied a new methodology in 7 patients with a fracture of the upper humeral head that required hemiarthroplasty, to implant a humeral prosthesis with an individualized posterior version. Our goal was to determine preoperatively the distance from the posterior edge of the bicipital groove...

  • Effects of diclofenac and tenoxicam on distraction osteogenesis. Sen, Cengiz; Erdem, Mehmet; Gunes, Taner; Koseoglu, Dogan; Filiz, Nurper O. // Archives of Orthopaedic & Trauma Surgery;Apr2007, Vol. 127 Issue 3, p153 

    In the management of bone defects, pseudoarthrosis, deformities, chronic osteomyelitis and in extremity lengthening procedures, the technique of distraction osteogenesis (DO) has been frequently used. In this experimental animal study, the effects of two non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs,...

  • Improvement of the shoulder function after large segment resection of the proximal humerus with the use of an inverse tumour prosthesis. Streitbuerger, Arne; Henrichs, Marcel; Gosheger, Georg; Ahrens, Helmut; Nottrott, Markus; Guder, Wiebke; Dieckmann, Ralf; Hardes, Jendrik // International Orthopaedics;Feb2015, Vol. 39 Issue 2, p355 

    Purpose: Active shoulder function after segmental tumour resection of the proximal humerus and endoprosthetic reconstruction is regularly compromised, while the overall arm function allows a satisfying use in daily activities. The main functional problem remains the loss of huge parts of the...

  • The humerus is the best place for bone lengthening. Sándor Kiss; Károly Pap; Tibor Vízkelety; Tamás Terebessy; Mária Balla; György Szőke // International Orthopaedics;Jun2008, Vol. 32 Issue 3, p385 

    Abstract  The aim of this study was to examine the effectiveness of lengthening the humerus in children and young adults. Between 1984 and 2005, the Orthopaedic Department of Semmelweis University elongated 11 humeri (ten patients) for reasons of congenital hypoplasia (four cases),...

  • Custom-made endoprosthetic total humerus reconstruction for musculoskeletal tumours. Natarajan, Mayil; Sameer, Mohamed; Kunal, Dheep; Balasubramanian, Navin // International Orthopaedics;Jan2012, Vol. 36 Issue 1, p125 

    Purpose: We analysed 11 patients with malignant musculoskeletal tumours of the humerus who underwent limb salvage surgery with total humeral custom endoprosthesis from 1990 to 2009. Methods: There were six male and five female patients, with a mean age of 17 years. The most common diagnosis was...

  • Extendible Prostheses for Children After Resection of Primary Malignant Bone Tumor: Twenty-seven Years of Experience. Schinhan, M.; Tiefenboeck, T.; Funovics, P.; Sevelda, F.; Kotz, R.; Windhager, R. // Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, American Volume;10/7/2015, Vol. 97 Issue 19, p1585 

    Background: Endoprosthetic replacement in children following resection of a malignant bone tumor still is controversial because of the high number of reoperations. The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term outcome with respect to limb-lengthening potential, satisfaction...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics