TITLE

Sucker punched?

AUTHOR(S)
Daly, Rich
PUB. DATE
June 2011
SOURCE
Modern Healthcare;6/20/2011, Vol. 41 Issue 25, p20
SOURCE TYPE
Trade Publication
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article discusses the impact of a series of penalties under U.S. federal healthcare with the purpose of improving the quality of patient care. It mentions that the use of these penalties is in the federal attempt to combat waste and fraud. However, it also cites some factors that could increase the negative impact on providers like losing percentage of the Medicare payments, repeats of uncoordinated approach followed by regulators implementing laws, and lengthy and expensive investigations for unintentional errors.
ACCESSION #
61838842

 

Related Articles

  • Providers decry imposing EHR penalties in 2015. Conn, Joseph // Modern Healthcare;12/22/2014, Vol. 44 Issue 51, p0002 

    The article looks at the U.S. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services laws related to implementation of penalties to the doctors and hospitals that will fail to meet federal electronic health-record (EHR) incentive-payment program standards in 2015. Topics discussed include views of Steven...

  • Small reprieve for Stage 2 deadline, but not ICD-10. Conn, Joseph // Modern Healthcare;3/3/2014, Vol. 44 Issue 9, p2 

    The article reports on the announcement made by U.S. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services administrator Marilyn Tavenne regarding the extension in the deadlines for adopting the Stage 2 of the federal electronic health-record incentive payment program and not in adopting the tenth version of...

  • Differences in the CMS Medicare and Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs. Raiford, Robin // ANIA-CARING Newsletter;2011, Vol. 26 Issue 1, p1 

    The article differentiates the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Medicare and Medicaid electronic health record (EHR) Incentive Programs. It states that there is 44,000 dollars for maximum payments for Medicare program Eligible Professionals for five payments while 63,750 dollars...

  • Looming threat. Conn, Joseph // Modern Healthcare;12/12/2011, Vol. 41 Issue 50, p30 

    The article explores the threats posed by the Electronic Prescribing Incentive Program of the U.S. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). It announces that the CMS will cut Medicare reimbursement payments by 1 % for possibly thousands of physicians come January 1, 2012. The creation of...

  • Senate panel seeking Stage 3 meaningful-use delay. Dickson, Virgil // Modern Healthcare;7/27/2015, Vol. 45 Issue 30, p0009 

    The article focuses on the delayed implementation of the Obama administration's Stage 3 rules in order to use the electronic health records (EHR) meaningfully. Topics discussed include views of Lamar Alexander, chairman of the Health and Pensions Committee, on EHR regulation, aims of expanding...

  • Here comes the money. Conn, Joseph; Zigmond, Jessica; Barr, Paul // Modern Healthcare;12/20/2010, Vol. 40 Issue 51, p11 

    The article discusses the highlights of a two-day meeting on the status of information technology (IT) programs under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, hosted by the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology in the U.S. According to Jessica Kahn of...

  • Feeling the $queeze. Carlson, Joe // Modern Healthcare;8/15/2011, Vol. 41 Issue 33, p20 

    The article discusses the results of the annual Executive Compensation Survey of "Modern Healthcare." The data, provided by Sullivan, Cotter and Associates, was drawn from responses of approximately 1,200 healthcare providers in the U.S. It found that in 2011, an average salary growth of 3.1...

  • Brief Highlights Balancing Sharing Data and Protecting Privacy.  // For the Record (Great Valley Publishing Company, Inc.);10/8/2012, Vol. 24 Issue 18, p35 

    The article focuses on the new policy brief by the Consumers Union and the Center for Democratic & Technology which provides solutions to improve the confidentiality and protection of electronic health information systems. It states that the policy brief provides recommendations to meet the gaps...

  • Meaningful use quality requirements clarified.  // Healthcare Benchmarks & Quality Improvement;Aug2011, Vol. 18 Issue 8, p89 

    The article presents a discussion of the frequently asked questions (FAQ) posted by the U.S. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) that outlines confirmations to which an eligible professional (EPs), eligible hospital and critical access hospital (CAH) must agree for the use of...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics