TITLE

Investigation points back to employee who complained? It's OK to punish her, too

PUB. DATE
January 2011
SOURCE
HR Specialist: Minnesota Employment Law;Jan2011, Vol. 4 Issue 1, p3
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article discusses a court case wherein the plaintiff was punished for allegedly engaging in improper behavior in the workplace along with a co-worker whom she complained for slapping her buttocks regularly.
ACCESSION #
61346193

 

Related Articles

  • Gentlemen: Don't Lose Your Cool. Addington, Mark A. // Lodging Hospitality;3/1/2006, Vol. 62 Issue 3, p28 

    The article discusses a case which illustrates the new danger facing male managers whose conduct may be considered discrimination when they lose control. A federal court held that a man who yells and screams at work may be discriminating on the basis of sex if a woman at work finds the behavior...

  • Anonymous complaint? Investigate to get all details.  // HR Specialist: California Employment Law;Apr2012, Vol. 6 Issue 4, p3 

    The article discusses the court case "Rodriguez v. Burbank Police Department," which deals with anonymous complaint about a hostile workplace.

  • What it means to you.  // Legal Alert for Supervisors;Apr2010, Vol. 5 Issue 116, p2 

    The article discusses the prevention of creating a hostile work environment including general discussions on issue and reminding the employees that lawsuits are costly.

  • Shoot for dismissal if employee's harassment case is based on only one comment.  // HR Specialist: Texas Employment Law;Nov2014, Vol. 9 Issue 11, p3 

    The article discusses the court case Fisher v. Dallas County, et al., which is concerned on the suit filed a black employee alleging a hostile work environment after hearing a Hispanic co-worker insulted publicly.

  • Rating the Sloba Show Will Justice Be Served? Gordy, Eric // Problems of Post-Communism;May/Jun2003, Vol. 50 Issue 3, p53 

    Focuses on the legal battle of Slobodan Milo&stilde;ević defending himself before an international tribunal on charges of war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocide. Legal process and legal precedent of the case.

  • Suit Reinstated Against Restaurant for Serving Meat to Hindus.  // India -- West;7/29/2011, Vol. 36 Issue 36, pA23 

    The article reports that a lawsuit filed by a group of Hindu residents has been reinstated by the state appellate court panel, in which the 16 Indian Americans can sue Moghul Express for money to travel to India for the purification of their souls after eating meat.

  • ARE YOUR EMPLOYEES RECORDING YOU?  // HR Professional;Jul/Aug2011, Vol. 28 Issue 5, p13 

    The article informs with advancing digital devices, employees are increasingly involved in recording of workplace events to use them as an evidence for future discrimination and other lawsuits as reported by labour experts and employment lawyers.

  • Employees vs. employers.  // Business Press;03/26/99, Vol. 11 Issue 47, p24 

    Lists three cases included in the `Top Ten Verdicts of 1998,' according to the `Lawyers Weekly.'

  • Beware boss who undermines anti-harassment rules.  // HR Specialist: California Employment Law;Feb2014, Vol. 8 Issue 2, p3 

    The article focuses on the court case Werner v. Advance Newhouse, ED CA, 2013, involving a women employee who alleged that her managers tried to keep the atmosphere sexually charged by undermining her efforts to desexualize the workplace.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics