TITLE

Economists Debate The Future

AUTHOR(S)
Bartlett, Michael
PUB. DATE
June 2011
SOURCE
Credit Union Journal;6/6/2011, p14
SOURCE TYPE
Trade Publication
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article focuses on the debate between senior economist Steve Rick, and Mike Schenk, Madison, Wisconsin-based trade group vice president for economics and statistics, regarding economy and economic issues during the Credit Union National Association (CUNA) Chief Financial Officer (CFO) Council Conference.
ACCESSION #
61073153

 

Related Articles

  • Fixing the Economy. Merrick, Bill // Credit Union Magazine;Nov2010, Vol. 76 Issue 11, p34 

    The article presents a debate between Credit Union National Association (CUNA) economists Steve Rick and Mike Schenk about the importance of federal deficit spending on reducing the length and severity of the Great Depression. It stresses that the government stimulus spending can promote...

  • Economists Trade Predictions on What's Ahead. Dernovsek, Darla // Credit Union Directors Newsletter;Oct2005, Vol. 29 Issue 10, p2 

    Presents an interview with Mike Schenk , vice president of Credit Union National Association, and senior economist Steve Rick regarding their projections on the effect of developments on credit union lenders in the U.S. Causal factors for the occurrence of mortgage bubble; Increase in fixed-rate...

  • CUNA's Economists Projecting Economic Slowdown In 2007.  // Credit Union Journal;7/31/2006, Vol. 10 Issue 30, p3 

    The article reports on the projected economic slowdown in 2007 by economists with Credit Union National Association (CUNA). CUNA's Chief Economist Bill Hampel said that savings growth will be hard to come by and downward pressure will continue. The forecast of CUNA's other economists which...

  • Remember The Other Credit Union Difference.  // Credit Union Journal;7/23/2012, Vol. 16 Issue 30, p46 

    The article reports on the statement of Credit Union National Association (CUNA) economist Mike Schenk that credit unions serve two significant roles on recessions such as a place people and a countervailing force.

  • Untitled. Pearce, Edward // New Statesman & Society;5/21/93, Vol. 6 Issue 253, p22 

    Opinion. Compares parliamentary debaters in Great Britain and those in other countries. American legislators as the worst; Comments on speeches in Germany and Australia; Reasons for British brilliance in polemics; Politicians in Britain that are noteworthy.

  • Assessing the jurisdictional model of topicality. Murphy, Thomas L. // Argumentation & Advocacy;Spring90, Vol. 26 Issue 4, p145 

    Examines the implications of topicality as a jurisdictional issue in debate. Definition of jurisdiction; Subject matter jurisdiction and the notion of guidance; Special appearance, waiver and reverse voting issues; Topicality and the special appearance analogy.

  • The jurisdiction/topicality analogy. Madsen, Arnie; Louden, Allan D. // Argumentation & Advocacy;Spring90, Vol. 26 Issue 4, p151 

    Comments on an article by Thomas L. Murphy about the jurisdiction standard of topicality in debate. Relationship between topicality and jurisdiction; Responses to indictments of the jurisdiction model; Topicality and the special appearance analogy.

  • Counterplan theory and the power to select resolutions. Ulrich, Walter R. // Argumentation & Advocacy;Spring90, Vol. 26 Issue 4, p154 

    Examines the counterplan theory and the power to select resolutions in debate. Domains of a resolution and topical counterplan theory; Topic selection as a selection of focus in the debate.

  • Hats off.  // New Hampshire Business Review;9/1/95, Vol. 17 Issue 18, p5 

    Reports on the debate at Salem High School, New Hampshire, regarding whether to ban all headgear in school for reasons other than religion, health or safety.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics