TITLE

Constitutional Tinkering

PUB. DATE
May 1979
SOURCE
National Review;5/11/1979, Vol. 31 Issue 19, p642
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article addresses the debate surrounding the proposed constitutional amendment to limit federal spending in the United States. According to the opponents of the proposal, economic doctrine should not be written into the Constitution. In response, the author states that criticism of the proposed amendment is unrealistic because economic husbandry in a democratic society is far less likely than economic profligacy.
ACCESSION #
6093058

 

Related Articles

  • Constitutional Tinkering.  // National Review;5/11/1979, Vol. 31 Issue 19, p642 

    The article addresses the debate surrounding the proposed constitutional amendment to limit federal spending in the United States. According to the opponents of the proposal, economic doctrine should not be written into the Constitution. In response, the author states that criticism of the...

  • The `balanced budget' movement is a threat to our economy.  // Social Policy;Spring96, Vol. 26 Issue 3, p46 

    This section presents the views of a group of economists, journalists and political policy analysts on the emergence of a misguided consensus among politicians regarding the need to balance the federal budget in the U.S. Instead of putting forth a sound program for addressing needs that...

  • WANTED: A CONSTITUTIONAL CRUTCH.  // National Review;5/11/1979, Vol. 31 Issue 19, p642 

    The article comments on the proposed constitutional amendment that will limit public spending in the United States. The author discusses the arguments in support of and against the proposal. The implication of the issue on how the U.S. perceives the importance of democracy and the Constitution...

  • Public notice. Garza, Tony // Business Press;9/22/95, Vol. 8 Issue 21, p2 

    Presents brief explanatory statements of the proposed constitutional amendments special election on November 7, 1995.

  • The British Constitution in 1994-1995. Shell, Donald // Parliamentary Affairs;Jul95, Vol. 48 Issue 3, p369 

    Discusses the movement for constitutional reform in Great Britain during the years 1994 to 1995. Labour Party and Conservative Party's interest in constitutional reform; Increase in interest in constitutional reform; Two-party politics and the constitution; Agenda for constitutional reform.

  • Take the `a' train. Wiesner, Pat // Colorado Business Magazine;Oct94, Vol. 21 Issue 10, p8 

    Discusses the reasons on the need for an amendment to the Colorado Constitution with emphasis on the issues covered by Amendment 12 and its implications. Payment and pension for legislators; Tax credit for campaign contributors; Government involvement in campaign issues.

  • PUBLIC NOTICE: BRIEF EXPLANATORY STATEMENTS OF PROPOSED CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS SPECIAL ELECTION NOVEMBER 6,2007.  // Edgewood Enterprise (TX);9/13/2007, Vol. 100 Issue 37, p8 

    The article presents explanatory statements of proposed constitutional amendments which include HJR 103, SJR 57 and HJR 40.

  • Florida reshapes Constitution. Gallo, Pete; Rannazzisi, Julie // Bond Buyer;08/28/97, Vol. 321 Issue 30219, p2 

    Highlights Florida Constitution Revision Commission's plan to make a major revision to its constitution.

  • Medium rare scrutiny. Paulsen, Michael Stokes // Constitutional Commentary;Fall98, Vol. 15 Issue 3, p397 

    Comments on the proliferation on the level of scrutiny and doctrinal tests in various First Amendment in the constitution of the United States. Rational and irrational basis of scrutiny; Standard of the Amendment; Challenge of equal protection cases.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics