TITLE

For The Record

PUB. DATE
September 1980
SOURCE
National Review;9/5/1980, Vol. 32 Issue 18, p1062
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article provides information related to public administration in the U.S. as of September 1980. Republican presidents submitted budgets which would have increased defense budget authority by 62 percent. When the budget proposed by President Jimmy Carter for fiscal year 1981 is compared with the amount he asked for three years ago, the real increase is a mere three percent. Meanwhile, the Republicans have proposed an across-the-board tax cuts. Reducing taxes of people would cost the government less than $1.5 billion in taxes.
ACCESSION #
6077922

 

Related Articles

  • It's a tax cut! Weiss, Lynne // Mother Jones;Mar/Apr95, Vol. 20 Issue 2, p17 

    Reports on the growing objection of taxpayers to the US Congress' plans to increase military spending and armaments acquisition. Increase in membership to war-tax resister organizations as reported by the National War Tax Resistance Coordinating Committee; New Campaign for Conscience's efforts...

  • An Economics Lesson From Russia.  // America;3/15/1980, Vol. 142 Issue 10, p203 

    The article expresses views on economics lesson that could be learned by the U.S. from Russia that spent excessively in military spending in the struggle for supremacy. It is noted that President Jimmy Carter requested for a 3.3 percent increase in defense budget for 1981. It cites that a...

  • Jimmy McGovern.  // National Review;1/20/1978, Vol. 30 Issue 3, p75 

    The article focuses on the defense budget of the United States under the administration of President Jimmy Carter. The President has approved the $126 billion defense budget which satisfied the Office of Management and Budget. The budget also shelved the development of the mobile missile, MX....

  • Goodbye to Defense's Gilded Age? Sharp, Travis // Foreign Policy in Focus;10/15/2008, p2 

    The author reflects on the end of the era of $700 billion per year defense budgets in the U.S. due to the economic crisis. He cites that falling tax revenues and increasing mandatory spending are obscuring the $700 billion annual defense budgets. He notes that the tax cuts of the administration...

  • Deal to stop sequestration will have more defense budget cuts and new tax increases. Eaglen, Mackenzie // Hill;6/27/2012, Vol. 19 Issue 82, p30 

    The article offers the author's insights regarding the effect of actions taken to stop sequestration on defense budget cuts and Bush tax cuts in the U.S.

  • Death and Taxes. Feffer, John // Foreign Policy in Focus;4/18/2012, p1 

    A reprint of the article "Death and Taxes," by John Feffer, published in "The Bellingham Herald" is presented. It discusses U.S. military spending with regard to taxes. The U.S. government spent 740 billion U.S. dollars on the military and that this spending accounts to 43% of the global...

  • Santa at the Pentagon. Chapman, Stephen // New Republic;12/29/79, Vol. 181 Issue 26, p6 

    Comments on the President Jimmy Carter Administration's insistence on increasing the defense budget in the United States. Effect of the failure of the second strategic arms limitation treaty in the Senate on Carter's plan to increase the military budget; Reason behind the doubt of some Senators...

  • The Three Percent Solution: NATO and the U.S. Defense Budget. Aspin, Les // Challenge (05775132);May/Jun79, Vol. 22 Issue 2, p22 

    Neither the extent of the Soviet Union's military build-up nor the actual benefits to North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) justify a 3 percent real increase in the U.S. defense spending. U.S. President Jimmy Carter's budget for fiscal year 1980 calls for military spending to rise 3.1...

  • Cake without Bakers.  // National Review;2/4/1977, Vol. 29 Issue 4, p135 

    The article criticizes U.S. President Jimmy Carter's fiscal policy. His fiscal policy is such that it may increase the number of poor and unemployed in the U.S. The problem with tax rebate plan is that it is temporary and based on past earnings. The problem with more public works and public jobs...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics