TITLE

Maternity leave leads to redundancy

PUB. DATE
April 1993
SOURCE
Accountancy;Apr93, Vol. 111 Issue 1196, p103
SOURCE TYPE
Trade Publication
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article reports on a case wherein the British Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) has been asked to consider a situation in which a company discovered that it had an over-capacity of staff and dismissed an employee while she was on maternity leave. In the Intelligent Applications Ltd. versus Wilson case, Wilson was employed by Intelligent Applications, a small computer hardware company, as a secretary with some additional administrative duties. In November 1990, Wilson told her employer that she was pregnant and would be taking maternity leave. In a short time before Wilson was due to return to work, the company notified her that she was being dismissed on the ground of redundancy following over-capacity. Section 60 of the Employment Protection Act 1978 provides that the dismissal of an employee is automatically unfair where the reason or principal reasons for her dismissal is that she is pregnant or is any other reasons connected with her pregnancy. The Industrial Tribunal agreed with Wilson--she had been dismissed for a reason connected with her pregnancy. The employer appealed to the EAT, which dismissed the appeal and upheld Wilson's contention that she had been unfairly dismissed.
ACCESSION #
6076042

 

Related Articles

  • Sex discrimination and pregnancy.  // Accountancy;Aug1985, Vol. 96 Issue 1104, p34 

    This article examines a decision of the British Employment Appeal Tribunal in Turley v. Allders Department Stores Ltd. which held that dismissal for pregnancy was not capable of constituting sex discrimination. The Tribunal affirms that it could not be direct discrimination under the Sex...

  • Dismissal without consultation. Keenan, Denis // Accountancy;Apr88, Vol. 101 Issue 1136, p48 

    This article focuses on a British Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) case that involved unfair dismissal of an employee in breach of a disciplinary code. In Hill versus Farr Filtration Ltd., it appears that Hill was a sales engineer. A new sales manager was appointed in January 1983, and made...

  • Statutory grievance procedure -- time limits in discrimination claims. Glavina, Joe // Employers Law;Apr2006, p9 

    The article reports the decision of the British Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) in the joined cases of Bupa Care Homes v. Cann and Spillett v. Tesco, which concern time limits in discrimination claims. The details of both these disability discrimination claims are presented along with the key...

  • Sweetin v Coral Racing.  // Employers Law;Apr2006, p11 

    The article reports the decision of the British Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) on the case Sweetin v. Coral Racing which concerns compensation for failure to consult before a Transfer of Undertakings Regulations transfer. The details of the case are presented along with the original judgment...

  • IN BRIEF.  // Employers Law;Jul/Aug2009, p8 

    This section offers news briefs on labor cases in Great Britain. The Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) has upheld a ruling that allows a disability discrimination claim brought outside the three-month time limit. In another case, the EAT ruled that a tribunal could use its discretion to extend...

  • Put web misuse policies high on your priority list. Brahams, Gareth // Personnel Today;11/19/2002, p16 

    Discusses the ruling of the Employment Appeal Tribunal of Great Britain regarding the validity of the decision of the Hillingdon London Borough Council in London, England to dismiss an employee for accessing hard-core pornography from the internet. Factors distinguishing the misuse of computers...

  • Rogers v The Deputy Commander & Anor. Malamatenios, David; Makin, Colin; Quinn, Linda; Santra, Krishna; Martin, Sandra // Employers Law;May2013, p8 

    The article discusses the court case Rogers versus (v.) The Deputy Commander & Anor wherein Rogers, a German national married to a British soldier, claimed the right for an unfair dismissal claim against the Garrison Amenities Fund but the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) dismissed the appeal.

  • Scotthorne v Four Seasons Conservations (UK).  // Employers Law;Aug2010, p8 

    The article discusses the court case, Scotthorne v. Four Seasons Conservatories, wherein the Great Britain Employment Appeal Tribunal dismissed a decision by an employment tribunal not to order disclosure of documents said to be capable of supporting the appellant's claim for unfair termination...

  • London Borough of Redbridge v Mrs S C Baynes.  // Employers Law;Aug2010, p9 

    The article discusses the court case, London Borough of Redbridge (LBR) v. Mrs. S C Baynes, wherein the Great Britain Employment Appeal Tribunal dismissed the decision of the employment tribunal on Baynes' unfair dismissal and disability discrimination lawsuit against the LBR, for the reason...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics