TITLE

Verification Tautologies

PUB. DATE
October 1979
SOURCE
National Review;10/26/1979, Vol. 31 Issue 43, p1347
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article speculates on how the United States Senate will vote on the issue of the Strategic Arms Limitation Talks II (SALT) treaty. According to the author, SALT II will allow the U.S. to monitor Soviet strategic weapons forces but it cannot verify Soviet compliance with the treaty's terms. The author expects the final decision of the Senate to be as ambiguous as the treaty's provisions.
ACCESSION #
6073789

 

Related Articles

  • A LAYMAN'S GUIDE TO FIXING THE INF TREATY. Gaffney Jr., Frank J. // National Review;3/18/1988, Vol. 40 Issue 5, p44 

    Considers the United States Senate's deliberation of the INF treaty of nuclear arms control involving the U.S. and the Soviet Union. Provisions of the treaty; Possibility of the Senate approving the treaty due to the pressure exerted by the administration; Aspects of the treaty that should be...

  • THE HARM IS DONE. Buckley Jr., Wm.F. // National Review;11/20/1987, Vol. 39 Issue 22, p66 

    Focuses on the U.S. Senate Foreign Relations Committee's hearing on the arguments for confirming the treaty arranged to remove intermediate nuclear weapons from Europe. Treaty proponents' belief that the agreement would not jeopardize America's vital interests; President Ronald Reagan's view on...

  • The Battle Is Joined.  // New Republic;7/21/79-7/28/79, Vol. 181 Issue 3/4, p4 

    Comments on the United States Senate Foreign Relations Committee's hearing on the Strategic Arms Limitation Treaty (SALT) II. Senate Intelligence Committee's plan to hold hearings on how the pact will be verified, if and when the Senate itself adopts the treaty; Number of strategic nuclear...

  • NPT: Movement Toward A Viable World. E. R. // Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists;Apr1969, Vol. 25 Issue 4, p48 

    The article reports on the ongoing ratification of the Nuclear Non-proliferation Treaty by the U.S. Senate. The treaty, which is a movement toward a viable world, is still apparent despite the loud alarms and violent excursions of hot and cold wars all over the world. The treaty confirms the...

  • Republican Senate Rejection of START Could Actually Work in Disarmament's Favor. Wellen, Russ // Foreign Policy in Focus;11/10/2010, p2 

    The article focuses on the significance of the possible rejection of the strategic arms reduction treaty (START) by the U.S. Republican Senate to disarmament. In an article in the "New York Times," John Bolton and John Yoo stressed the need for the Senate to either reject or amend START to...

  • The Eisenhower Administration and the Nuclear Test Ban Talks, 1958–1960: Another Challenge to “Revisionism”. Smith-Norris, Martha // Diplomatic History;Sep2003, Vol. 27 Issue 4, p503 

    When the U.S. Senate voted against the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty (CTBT) in 1999, the world community reacted with dismay. Three years before the U.S. rejected the agreement, it had been endorsed by a large majority of the United Nations General Assembly. Supporters of the accord argued that...

  • INF: INVITATION TO CHEAT? Trachtenberg, David J. // National Review;3/4/1988, Vol. 40 Issue 4, p41 

    Considers the key aspects of the INF treaty of nuclear weapons debated upon by the United States Senate. Issues of verification and compliance as the major concerns of the Senate; Reasons why the nature of the treaty may encourage the Soviet Union to violate the agreement's terms; Provisions of...

  • A Rerun of 1919?  // New Republic;1/13/79, Vol. 180 Issue 2, p3 

    Comments on the international security implications of Section 2 of Article II in the Constitution of the U.S. giving the president the right to make treaties provided two thirds of the senators present concur on the treaty. Possibility of the Senate rejecting a Strategic Arms Limitation Treaty...

  • LETTER FROM WASHINGTON. Rovere, Richard // New Yorker;10/5/1963, Vol. 39 Issue 33, p149 

    The article focuses on U.S. senators' ratification of the Treaty of Moscow and its historical significance for nuclear arms control. It highlights the arguments expressed by the senators in ratifying or opposing the treaty. The appeals of disarmament and coexistence as well as the reactions of...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics