All for the Loss of a Nail

October 1981
National Review;10/2/1981, Vol. 33 Issue 19, p1123
The article discusses the issues surrounding the defense budget of the U.S. as of October 1981. An editorial in the "New York Times" suggested that the government would have saved billions by doing without unneeded military weaponry like the B-1 bomber and the submarine-launched Trident II missile. According to spokesmen from the Army, the Navy and the Air Force, cuts made to the defense budget did not affect their readiness. The increase in the defense budget was instituted when the Soviet Union began to amass its forces during the past years.


Related Articles

  • Bomber Future Cloudy. Aboulafia, Richard // Aviation Week & Space Technology;1/19/2004, Vol. 160 Issue 3, p28 

    The U.S. Air Force's consistent preference for tactical combat aircraft continues to weigh against the entire concept of the manned strategic bomber. New bomber development programs are nowhere in sight, and even the existing fleet is under budgetary pressure. Nevertheless, the U.S. bomber...

  • THE MILITARY'S NEW LOOK EMERGES. Wilson, George C. // National Journal;2/8/2003, Vol. 35 Issue 6, p466 

    Focuses on the defense budget for fiscal 2004 unveiled by U.S. President George W. Bush in February 2003. Plans of the Army to create several mobile Stryker brigades; Development of a littoral combat ship for the Navy; Increase in the budget for unmanned vehicles of the Air Force.

  • Hill Settles On $441.5 Billion 2006 Defense Authorization Bill, Few Major Changes. Cahlink, George // Defense Daily;12/20/2005, Vol. 228 Issue 49, p1 

    The article reports on the passage of the 2006 defense authorization bill by the U.S. Congress. Lawmakers have approved the defense bill which provides a modest increase in funding for procurement and research and development. The DD(X) program of the Navy receive a slight increase in funding...

  • THE NEXT WAR. Freedberg Jr., Sydney J. // Government Executive;8/15/2012, Vol. 44 Issue 9, p10 

    The article focuses on budget of the U.S. armed forces, which will determine how they will perform in the coming years. It states that the U.S. Navy and Air Force have edge over the U.S. Army due to their joint AirSea Battle concept. It mentions that navy and air force have hinted about...

  • Pentagon May Face In-House Rivalry For Dollars, Budget Experts Say. DiMascio, Jen // Defense Daily;2/1/2007, Vol. 233 Issue 20, p4 

    The article focuses on issues behind the agreement about how the U.S. Department of Defense's funding is divided. 31 percent of the budget goes to the Navy, 29 percent for the Air Force, 24 percent for the Army and 16 percent for defense agencies. There is a greater concern in the Navy and the...

  • One- or Two-War Capability? Friedman, Norman // U.S. Naval Institute Proceedings;Sep2005, Vol. 131 Issue 9, p88 

    The article focuses on issues related to the change in the military policy of the U.S. Reports of the ongoing Quadrennial Defense Review suggest that the long-standing two-war strategy is being replaced by a one-war concept, because the country cannot afford enough troops. Reports of budgetary...

  • Ideas Under the Ceiling.  // Time;12/8/1958, Vol. 72 Issue 23, p19 

    The article focuses on the effects of the 41.6 billion dollars ceiling of the 1960 defense budget proposed by U.S. Defense Secretary Neil McElroy. It mentions that the budget ceiling caused Pentagon to examine the duplication and obsolescence among the missile programs of U.S. It states that the...

  • Battle Renewed.  // Time;12/22/1952, Vol. 60 Issue 25, p18 

    The article reports on the ongoing conflict between the U.S. Navy and the U.S. Air Force due to issues concerning budget, strategic actions, and service leadership. The Navy is hoping to secure funds for the completion of its supercarrier-production program by convincing Defense Secretary Bob...

  • What Air-Sea Battle Is Not. Sweetman, Bill // Defense Technology International;Jun2012, Vol. 6 Issue 6, p54 

    The author comments on the Air-Sea Battle (ASB) philosophy, an initiative supported by both U.S. Navy and Air Force leaders. According to the author, ASB is not about China nor about cutting the Army and the Marine Corps out of the fight or out of the budget. The author adds ASB is not about...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics