Welcome to the Club

Martin, Malachi B.
June 1979
National Review;6/8/1979, Vol. 31 Issue 23, p746
The article reflects on the U.S. Supreme Court decision that allows public figures who are suing for libel to inquire into the thoughts of the media people. It cites some arguments against the ruling. It addresses the issue of free press in the U.S. It discusses the factors threatening the First Amendment.


Related Articles

  • ON A CONSTITUTIONAL COLLISION COURSE: ATTORNEY NO-COMMENT RULES AND THE RIGHT OF ACCESS TO INFORMATION. Weisberg, Lynn // Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology;Fall1992, Vol. 83 Issue 3, p644 

    This article argues that the First Amendment restraint on free speech in the U.S. is unjustified and therefore unconstitutional. It first traces the history of attorney no-comment rules from their inception as recommendations designed for heavily publicized cases to their present form as...

  • Pretrial Publicity and Courtroom Umami. Lofink, Celia R.; Mullaney, Marie // Jury Expert;May/Jun2013, Vol. 25 Issue 3, p4 

    The article focuses on issues concerning pretrial publicity as well as the use of litigation technology in the U.S. courtroom. It provides several tips in relation to court cases such as maintaining a database of content for access by the team, utilizing a content analysis technique of compiled...

  • WHEN PLED ALLEGATIONS HIT THE NEWSPAPERS. DOWNEY, MICHAEL // Litigation;Spring2012, Vol. 38 Issue 3, p64 

    The article presents information on defamation lawsuits, the related allegations and the filing of complaints. The importance of litigation privilege, the protection offered to the in-court statements and the role of affirmative defense protecting lawyers are discussed. The issues related to the...

  • How to fix our justice system: Let the media be the jury. Rentschler, William H. // Editor & Publisher;10/29/94, Vol. 127 Issue 44, p50 

    Discusses the effects of the media in the United States justice system. Presumption of guilt and innocence; Trial by publicity.

  • Trial by Press? Anderson, Charles-Edward // ABA Journal;Sep90, Vol. 76 Issue 9, p32 

    Reports on the proceedings in the forum which debated the topic 'Selecting Impartial Juries: Must Ignorance Be a Virtue in Our Search for Justice?,' sponsored by the Annenberg Washington Program. Consensus among panelists that pretrial publicity does not bias jurors; Participation of judges,...

  • NEW PROPOSAL TO DEAL WITH LIBEL. Goldberg, Stephanie Benson // ABA Journal;Jan1989, Vol. 75 Issue 1, p34 

    Focuses on the proposed changes in handling libel lawsuits in the United States from the Libel Reform Project of the Northwestern University. Prevention for plaintiffs for filing suit without demanding retraction or the right to reply; Suggestion for electing a no-fault trial for a declaratory...

  • Libel trials reach record number.  // Editor & Publisher;06/27/98, Vol. 131 Issue 26, p49 

    Reports that the number of libel trials in the United States has reached 22 and the average jury award was $588,700 in 1997, according to the Libel Defense Resource Center.

  • DEFAMATION: THE NEW LEGAL CHALLENGE TO EMPLOYERS. Torsone, Johnna G. // Management Review;May87, Vol. 76 Issue 5, p12 

    Focuses on the challenges faced by employers in the United States involved in defamation lawsuits. Categories that will make employers liable for defamation suits; Details of the constitutional basis of defamation lawsuits; Case examples illustrating employer experiences.

  • The media frets while libel cases are pondered.  // ABA Journal;Feb84, Vol. 70 Issue 2, p116 

    Provides an overview of news media cases argued before the Supreme Court on November 8, 1983, that could affect the way libel actions are brought. Bose Corp.'s contentions of product disparagement against 'Consumer Reports'; Kathy Keeton's libel and invasion of privacy claims against 'Hustler';...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics