TITLE

Report from the Pearl Harbor Committee to Keep One's Eyes on the Russian Fleet

AUTHOR(S)
Buckley Jr., WM. F.
PUB. DATE
January 1977
SOURCE
National Review;1/7/1977, Vol. 29 Issue 1, p48
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article examines the threat posed by the Soviet military strength and buildup on the security of the United States. Secretary of the Navy J. William Middendorf II expressed his concerns in his reaction to a "New York Times" editorial. Secretary of State Henry Kissinger also reacted to a proposal by the Soviet Union. The code of conduct in case a war breaks out between the North Atlantic Treaty Organization and Warsaw Pact countries is examined.
ACCESSION #
6071541

 

Related Articles

  • Henry's Revised History. Kondracke, Morton // New Republic;8/18/79, Vol. 181 Issue 7, p8 

    Comments on Henry Kissinger's role in the SALT II agreement between the U.S. and the Soviet Union. Author's observation that Kissinger has regained favor with the Republican Party, even with his old adversary, Ronald Reagan, because of his SALT testimony; Author's claim that Kissinger has...

  • COUNTDOWN. Buckley Jr., WM. F. // National Review;11/15/1985, Vol. 37 Issue 22, p62 

    Examines the status of the arms race negotiation between the United States and the Soviet Union. Strategies used by Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev to get the support of other European nations with regards to the arms control issue; Policies of the United States on weapons production; Extent of...

  • Reversing the Arms Race: A Differential Game. Melese, Fran├žois; Michel, Philippe // Southern Economic Journal;Apr91, Vol. 57 Issue 4, p1133 

    The objective of this paper is twofold: (1) to briefly reflect on the evolution of Richardson-type arms models, and (2) to reformulate the model in order to examine possible impacts of changes in bilateral defense policies. Although historically the United States and Soviet Union provided the...

  • More Weapons for What? Burnham, James // National Review;2/4/1977, Vol. 29 Issue 4, p140 

    The article compares the defensive status of the Soviet Union and the United States. It is indicated that the Soviet Union is improving its position relative to the U.S. and is being considered superior to the U.S. in defense readiness. The Soviet Union government is concentrating on producing...

  • Nuclear learning and U.S.-Soviet security regimes. Nye Jr., Joseph S. // International Organization;Summer87, Vol. 41 Issue 3, p371 

    The concepts of regimes and learning have been developed in the Liberal theory of international relations, but their application has been mostly in the area of international political economy. U.S. Soviet relations are generally explained solely in terms of Realist theory. The dichotomy is...

  • A global role for NATO. Arkin, William M. // Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists;Jan1986, Vol. 42 Issue 1, p4 

    Comments on the concerted effort to push North Atlantic Treaty Organization countries into wider 'out-of-area' responsibilities. Actions of NATO in the out-of-area operations field; Efforts of the U.S. to reconfigure its forces to give them greater flexibility in out-of-area operations; Reagan...

  • U.S.--Soviet Military Strength. Moorer, Thomas H. // Vital Speeches of the Day;10/1/73, Vol. 39 Issue 24, p738 

    Presents the text of a speech given by U.S. Navy Admiral Thomas H. Moorer, on September 6, 1973, which deals with U.S.-Soviet Union military relations.

  • Summitry Circus.  // National Review;8/15/1986, Vol. 38 Issue 15, p15 

    Focuses on the foreign policy of the U.S. on Soviet Union. Concern on whether the government is prepared to negotiate away strategic defenses for a commitment by the Soviets to reduce their intercontinental ballistic missile force; Principles about sound arms-control policy.

  • CONVENTIONAL ARMS IN SOVIET FOREIGN POLICY. Finley, David D. // World Politics;Oct80, Vol. 33 Issue 1, p1 

    Military relations between the United States and the Soviet Union over the past decade exhibit an apparent paradox: professed mutual interests in parity yielding in practice to a competitive military buildup. The paper examines four hypothetical explanations-denoted respectively as the...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics