Freedom and Parochial Schools

Kirk, Russell
April 1977
National Review;4/15/1977, Vol. 29 Issue 14, p441
The article reports on the suit against Bishop Andrew G. Grutka of the diocese of Gary, Indiana filed by the United States National Labor Relations Board. It focuses on the issuance of the temporary restraining order by the Disrict Court and the constitutional issues involved in the proceedings. The right of the parochial schools to provide religious instruction is also highlighted.


Related Articles

  • U.S. Chamber sues NLRB over its final rule requiring posting of employee rights notice.  // AHA News;9/26/2011, Vol. 47 Issue 19, p6 

    The article reports on the lawsuit filed by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the South Carolina Chamber of Commerce against the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) in mid-September 2011 to challenge NLRB's directive on employers covered by the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA).

  • NLRB Again Told to Consider Monetary Refusal-to-Bargain Remedy.  // Labor Law Journal;Jun70, Vol. 21 Issue 6, p382 

    This article reports on the decision of the federal appellate court in the District of Columbia asking the U.S. National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) to consider monetary refusal-to-bargain remedy in 1970. The NLRB found that a company acted in bad faith in refusing to bargain with a union on...

  • N.L.R.B. v. Baptist Hospital, Inc.: Union Solicitation in Health Care Institutions. Gold, Jay Alexander // American Journal of Law & Medicine;Spring80, Vol. 6 Issue 1, p105 

    In 1974, Congress passed the Health Care Amendments to the National Labor Relations Act, thus bringing nonprofit health care institutions within the purview of the Act and within the jurisdiction of the National Labor Relations Board. Since the passage of these Amendments, the Board consistently...

  • CIRCUIT ROUNDUP. Post, Ashley // InsideCounsel;Aug2012, Vol. 23 Issue 248, p62 

    The article discusses several court cases in the U.S. One is NLRB v. Starbucks which orders the company's baristas to limit the number of pro-union accessories they wear. Another is U.S. v. Pruett which convicted a chief executive officer for violation of the Clean Water Act. Another one is...

  • LABOR--NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD DECLINES TO DEFER ARBITRATION.  // Arbitration Journal;Sep77, Vol. 32 Issue 3, p232 

    The article focuses on the court case Hawaiian Hauling Service v. National Labor Relations Board. Where an employee was discharged for calling his supervisor a "liar" in a grievance meeting, the National Labor Relations Board did not abuse its discretion in refusing to defer to an arbitral award...

  • NLRA Limits on Anti-Fraternization Policies Renew Concerns for Employers. Greenberg, Richard I.; Rosen, Philip B. // Venulex Legal Summaries;2007 Q1, p1 

    The article discusses the case Guardsmark, LLC versus National Labor Relations Board which deals with anti-fraternization policies. It presents a background of the case in which the General Counsel of the National Labor Relations Board complained that the anti-fraternization policy of the...

  • Taracorp and Remedies for Weingarten Violations: The Evolution of Industrial Due Process. Hogler, Raymond L. // Labor Law Journal;Jul86, Vol. 37 Issue 7, p403 

    This article analyzes the lawsuits filed by the U.S. National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) against J. Weingarten Inc. and Taracorp Industries in 1986. In NLRB v. J. Weingarten Inc. the U.S. Supreme Court determined that an employee has a right under the National Labor Relations Act to request...

  • U.S. Supreme Court Rules 5-4: Two-Member National Labor Relations Board Lacked Authority to Act.  // Venulex Legal Summaries;2010 Q2, Special section p1 

    The article discusses a court case wherein the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) should comply with Section 3(b) of the Taft-Hartley Act in order to exercise its authority. The Court challenged the validity of two-member rulings by the NLRB, maintaining that...

  • Union Fined for Boycotts at JFK and Empire State. Wich, Scott M. // HR Magazine;Apr2007, Vol. 52 Issue 4, p114 

    The article reports on the National Labor Relations Board v. Local 3, IBEW case. The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the decision of a special master finding that Local 3, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW), engaged in two instances of unlawful secondary boycott...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics