TITLE

That Grain Embargo

PUB. DATE
February 1980
SOURCE
National Review;2/8/1980, Vol. 32 Issue 3, p139
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article offers a look at the effects of the embargo of the U.S. grain shipments to Moscow, Soviet Union, on the grain market. The declaration made by U.S. President Jimmy Carter resulted in increase in the grain prices amidst various arguments and speculations related to the effect of the grain market due to the development. The article further presents a critique on the statement made by Milton Friedman, recipient of the 1976 Nobel Memorial Prize for economic science related to the implications of the declaration on the economies of the U.S. and the Soviet Union.
ACCESSION #
6063142

 

Related Articles

  • Oil and Geopolitics: The Oil Crises of the 1970s and the Cold War. Painter, David S. // Historical Social Research;2014, Vol. 39 Issue 4, p186 

    Examination of the geopolitics of oil in the 1970s provides important insights into the nature and dynamics of the Cold War. Possession of ample domestic oil supplies and the ability to ensure access to foreign oil reserves were significant elements in the power position of the United States in...

  • High-Tech Ban.  // Time;Jun1981, Vol. 117 Issue 22, p64 

    The article offers information on the U.S. Government rule that bans the sale of high-technology equipment to the Soviet Union and other Communist nations. It discusses the inconsistency in the enforcement of the U.S. Western trade embargo. It mentions the seizure of three crates of cargo by...

  • Importation panel debates open market. Johnsen, Michael // Drug Store News;2/16/2004, Vol. 26 Issue 2, p10 

    Reports that several public policy leaders have debated the merits of creating an open pharmaceutical market between Canada and the U.S., against the backdrop of more Food and Drug Administration action against importing and more states facilitating the practice. Pacific Research Institute as...

  • Breaking Down Barriers To US-Soviet Trade With Soviet Market Access For Small and Medium Size US Companies. Milosh, Eugene J. // Columbia Journal of World Business;Summer88, Vol. 23 Issue 2, p81 

    US-Soviet trade has had a spotty history of success linked to political and security considerations. A broader approach based on reciprocal market access is suggested as an alternative pragmatic strategy for the business community to pursue. "Perestroika" and "Glasnost" indicate that the timing...

  • The New US Joint Ventures in the USSR: Assessment and Management of Political Risk. Nigh, Douglas; Smith, Karen D. // Columbia Journal of World Business;Summer89, Vol. 24 Issue 2, p39 

    This study examines the perception, assessment, and management of political risk by the first American companies entering joint ventures in the USSR. Using information gathered in interviews with executives of these early entrants, the study draws some lessons useful to American companies...

  • With the Kremlin, Trade Is a One-Way Street.  // Saturday Evening Post;7/16/1960, Vol. 233 Issue 3, p8 

    Focuses on issues related to the trade between the Soviet Union and the U.S., as of July 16, 1960. Announcement by the U.S. Department of Commerce, that shipments of machinery and other hitherto prohibited articles, to the Soviet Union, are to be permitted; Formation of the foreign-trade...

  • Business, Labor, & the Anti-Communist Struggle. Puddington, Arch // National Review;1/27/1984, Vol. 36 Issue 1, p29 

    The article focuses on the foreign economic relations of the U.S. with the Soviet Union. Business leaders have become cautious about advancing sweeping claims concerning the beneficial effects of trade with the Soviets. It is undeniable that businessmen from other non-Communist countries, eager...

  • To the Communists, Trade is Just Another Weapon.  // Saturday Evening Post;2/12/1955, Vol. 227 Issue 33, p10 

    The author reflects on the trade relations between the Soviet Union and the U.S. According to a report, the U.S. Department of Commerce had approved the immediate export to the Soviet of $500,000 worth of oil-field machinery. Despite the cold war between the two nations, Soviet leaders consider...

  • Rollback, New Style. Crozier, Brian // National Review;7/23/1982, Vol. 34 Issue 14, p884 

    The article emphasizes the need for the U.S. and the Soviet Union to pull their military forces out of Europe. At the summit conference of July 1955, the Western line was expected to call for free elections in West and East Germany, leading to reunification. But just before the Summit, the...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics