No Critical Credibility

March 1979
National Review;3/16/1979, Vol. 31 Issue 11, p340
The article refutes the assertions made by Tom Wicker in his article "No Nuclear Credibility," published in the "New York Times," about the safety of nuclear power. Wicker claimed that hundreds of claims have been filed against the government for damages caused by atomic-bomb tests in Nevada in the 1950s. Wicker claimed too that many people who worked with the Navy's nuclear reactor program are being diagnosed of leukemia. It presents facts about the safety nuclear power.


Related Articles

  • After disaster: the people who call Chernobyl home. Peterson, Scott // Christian Science Monitor;12/15/2000, Vol. 93 Issue 16, p7 

    Reports on the decommissioning of the Chernobyl nuclear power plant in Ukraine. History of the plant; Health aspects of radioactive fallout from the plant; Outlook for continued problems due to fallout in the area.

  • OPINION ON THE DIABLO CANYON NUCLEAR POWER PLANT: THE EFFECTS OF SITUATION AND SOCIALIZATION. George, David L.; Southwell, Priscilla L. // Social Science Quarterly (University of Texas Press);Dec1986, Vol. 67 Issue 4, p722 

    The paper analyzes the opinions of San Luis Obispo County, California, residents concerning the nearby Diablo Canyon nuclear power plant. The belief that serious health risks are associated with nuclear power is the strongest predictor of opposition to Diablo Canyon. Lower-income, better...

  • Nuclear Regulatory Commission: Preventing Problem Plants Requires More Effective Action by NRC: T-RCED-98-252. Jones, Gary // GAO Reports;7/30/1998, p1 

    The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is responsible for ensuring that the nation's 103 commercial nuclear power plants operate in a manner that adequately protects public health and safety. Identifying nuclear plants with safety problems and ensuring that their owners correct safety problems...

  • Section 8. Nuclear energy.  // Monthly Energy Review;Dec97, p103 

    Presents an overview of statistical data focusing on the use of nuclear energy. Information on nuclear power plants operations; Number of nuclear generating units during 1973 to 1997.

  • CSNI Technical Opinion Papers.  // OECD Papers;2002, Vol. 2 Issue 12, p1 

    Presents the Nuclear Energy Agency's Committee on the Safety of Nuclear Installations' opinion papers. Fire probabilistic safety assessment for nuclear power plants; Seismic probabilistic safety assessment for nuclear facilities.

  • The Royal Society backs The Engineer's call for new nuclear build. Coppinger, Rob // Engineer (00137758);2/21/2003, Vol. 291 Issue 7621, p11 

    Suggests the building of additional nuclear power stations in Great Britain. Government plans for existing nuclear stations; Energy shortfall the could results from the lack of nuclear power.

  • Nuclear power's burdened future. Flavin, Christopher // Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists;Jul/Aug1987, Vol. 43 Issue 6, p26 

    Focuses on the impending collapse of the United States nuclear construction business during the late 1980s. Reasons for the failure of the United States nuclear power program, which ranks as the largest managerial disaster in business history; Dependence of nuclear program on political...

  • Average cost of new U.S. nuclear power plant.  // Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists;Jul/Aug1987, Vol. 43 Issue 6, p28 

    Presents a graph which shows the average cost of new U.S. nuclear power plant from 1970 to 1985.

  • Nuclear programme revived.  // Modern Power Systems;Dec96, Vol. 16 Issue 12, p7 

    Focuses on the Indian government's decision to revive its nuclear power program with plans to build a series of power units.


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics