Aborting Abortion

July 1977
National Review;7/8/1977, Vol. 29 Issue 26, p766
The article reports on the U.S. Supreme Court ruling, regarding abortion. The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that neither the Court nor federal law requires states to pay for abortion when the life of the mother is not endangered. Opinions of those committed to the cause of abortion-on-demand, and the rise in anti-abortion sentiment in the U.S. Congress, are also discussed.


Related Articles

  • Supreme Court to rule on abortion regulations. Fraga, Brian // Our Sunday Visitor;11/29/2015, Vol. 104 Issue 31, p5 

    No abstract available.

  • Pro-choice ad blitz seeks to overturn abortion ruling. Miller, Cyndee // Marketing News;7/22/1991, Vol. 25 Issue 15, p6 

    The article reports the campaigns and advertising efforts of both pro-choice and pro-life groups as U.S. Congress debates on a law that will overturn the Supreme Court's ruling against federally funded clinics discussing abortion with patients. The National Abortion Rights Action League...

  • Fla. Districts Sue State Over Property Assessments.  // Education Week;11/7/1990, Vol. 10 Issue 10, p15 

    The article discusses the U.S. Supreme Court's stand in the issue of abortion-counseling ban. The author's discussion centers on the court ruling in the case of Rust vs. Sullivan and New York vs. Sullivan. Lawyers for the Justice Department have argued that the law has expressly prohibited...

  • The Battle for Saliency. Schneider, William // Atlantic (02769077);Oct92, Vol. 270 Issue 4, p28 

    Discusses the implications of the abortion issue case between Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania and Casey. Decision of the U.S. Supreme Court to accept restrictions on abortion rights; Declaration of defeat by both pro-choice and anti-abortion advocates; Intention of the...

  • Fourteen Years of Devotion and Dedication. Andrusko, Dave // National Right to Life News;May2007, Vol. 34 Issue 5, p1 

    The author celebrates the pro-life movement's victory with the U.S. Supreme Court's decision to uphold the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act in 2007. Comparing the National Right to Life's (NRLC) fourteen-year struggle to secure the ban to William Wilberforce's crusade against the British slave...

  • From the Archives: What the Difference Is (1979). McFadden, J. P. // Human Life Review;Winter/Spring2011, Vol. 37 Issue 1/2, p89 

    The article discusses the controversy dur to the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court to approve the legalization of abortion in the country on January 22, 1973. It contemplates on the appropriateness of the Court's ruling in relation to the moral and spiritual aspects of human life. It further...

  • Half-Life. Ponnuru, Ramesh // New Republic;5/1/2006, Vol. 234 Issue 16, p12 

    The article discusses the possibility of the overturning of Roe v. Wade, the Supreme Court ruling that allows women to get abortions in the United States. Political pundits believe that the Republican Party would be greatly hurt if pro-abortion laws were overturned. Republicans would have to...

  • NRLC Affiliate Passed New Hampshire's Law Heard by United States Supreme Court. Stenson, Roger // National Right to Life News;Jan2006, Vol. 33 Issue 1, p1 

    The article reflects on the hearing of the case Ayotte versus Planned Parenthood before the U.S. Supreme Court on November 30, 2005 which challenges the parental notification of abortion law in New Hampshire. It explains the role of the National Right to Life movement in enacting the parental...

  • The Next Roe v. Wade? Hass, Nancy // Newsweek;12/19/2011, Vol. 158 Issue 25, p25 

    The article discusses an abortion debate in the U.S. after Idaho resident Jennie McCormack terminated her pregnancy with an abortion pill. Topics include her arrest due to the Idaho law RU-486 forbidding women from performing their own abortions, the views of the pro-choice and pro-life...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics