An American Myth

April 1976
National Review;4/16/1976, Vol. 28 Issue 13, p375
This article comments on the trial for the kidnapping case of Patty Hearst in 1976. In this case, the verdict reached by the jury does not possibly make much difference to the symbolic role. What has been provided on each case is the fact that popularly perceived circumstances conspired to produce it, and in turn, those circumstances provided glamour and fascination in the court. Appealing to the imagination of the people who are aware of the case were not legal and moral issues of guilt, but the story of Hearst itself.


Related Articles

  • Absent witnesses and the UK Supreme Court: judicial deference as judicial dialogue? Requa, Marny // International Journal of Evidence & Proof;Sep2010, Vol. 14 Issue 3, p208 

    This article analyses the position of absent witness evidence under the UK Criminal Justice Act 2003 after significant European and domestic case law on the topic. It argues that flexibility in the hearsay regime under the 2003 Act and a permissive approach by appellate courts has increased the...

  • The Hindsight Bias and Attitudes toward Police Deception in Eliciting Confessions. Wasieleski, David T.; Whatley, Mark A.; Murphy, Shannon // North American Journal of Psychology;2009, Vol. 11 Issue 2, p285 

    This study investigated the attitudes of undergraduates regarding police use of deception in eliciting confessions. Participants read a brief vignette of an actual murder case involving such use of deception where we manipulated the outcome of the trial. Legal authoritarianism and crime control...

  • Is "Proof Beyond a Reasonable Doubt" a Self-Evident Concept? Considering the U.S. and the Italian Legal Cultures towards the Understanding of the Standard of Persuasion in Criminal Cases. Picinali, Federico // Global Jurist;Oct2009, Vol. 9 Issue 4, p6 

    With its fundamental decision In re Winship (1970) the United States Supreme Court set the constitutional basis of the standard of persuasion in criminal trials. The long standing standard of "proof beyond a reasonable doubt" was selected by the Court as the bedrock that protects the values at...

  • The Walker case.  // Columbia Journalism Review;Fall1966, Vol. 5 Issue 3, p2 

    This article focuses on the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court to review a court case concerning the $500,000 libel award made by a Texas jury to retired major General Edwin A. Walker at the expense of The Associated Press in September 1966. The suit was but one of fifteen, totaling at one time...

  • RELIABILITY MATTERS: REASSOCIATING BAGLEY MATERIALITY, STRICKLAND PREJUDICE, AND CUMULATIVE HARMLESS ERROR. Blume, John H.; Seeds, Christopher // Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology;Summer2005, Vol. 95 Issue 4, p1153 

    This article argues that U.S. courts should consider the impact of the violations from the Brady versus Maryland and Strickland versus Washington cases when evaluating whether a guilty verdict or death sentence is reliable. It traces the history of the Strickland and Brady doctrines, addresses...

  • Trust issues tear at Hearst. Laporte, Nicole // Daily Variety;4/27/2005, Vol. 287 Issue 18, p1 

    The article reports that Patricia Hearst and other heirs are pressing the Hearst Corp. to unseal the will and probate file of her grandfather, William Randolph Hearst. Three decades after the will and probate file of newspaper titan William Randolph Hearst was sealed, Patricia Hearst is filing a...

  • FIFTH AMENDMENT--MPEACHMENT.  // Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology;Dec1975, Vol. 66 Issue 4, p419 

    This article focuses on the ruling of the United States Supreme Court in the criminal cases Oregon versus Hass and United States versus Hale. In these two cases the Court considered whether evidence which in inadmissible as proof of guilt may be used by the prosecution on cross-examination to...

  • Judicial Errors That Magnify Presidential Power. FISHER, LOUIS // Federal Lawyer;Jan/Feb2014, Vol. 61 Issue 1, p66 

    The article focuses on the issue of judicial mistakes committed by federal courts including the Supreme Court in the U.S. due to misconception about presidential power and their correction. It reflects on the issue by discussing the decision of the D.C. circuit court in the Jerusalem passport...

  • Closing Argument: Prospective, Not Retrospective -or- The Closing Argument: Telling the Future, Not the Past. Gerchen, Bob // Jury Expert;Jul2012, Vol. 24 Issue 4, p14 

    The article offers information on the closing arguments during litigation in the court room. It mentions some of internal issues in the courtroom by time when closing arguments are about to be delivered. It discusses tips in the preparation of closing arguments, which include thinking...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics