TITLE

The Canal: Interim Notes

AUTHOR(S)
Burnham, James
PUB. DATE
November 1977
SOURCE
National Review;11/25/1977, Vol. 29 Issue 46, p1351
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
This article reflects on the new treaties regarding the Panama Canal that have been signed by the U.S. and Panama. A big debate has taken place over these treaties. The treaties are unsatisfactory from whatever side one looks at them. However, the treaties are the best the negotiators could have signed. The choice before the U.S. Senate is whether to ratify or not to ratify the treaties. These treaties offer no guarantee against future difficulties. That, however, is not sufficient logic for refusing to ratify them.
ACCESSION #
6058192

 

Related Articles

  • The Key to Southeast Central America. Keepauver, John // National Review;4/28/1978, Vol. 30 Issue 17, p520 

    The article presents a fictional account of the Panama Canal treaties in the conversation between Temporary Deputy membership Drive Commander, Ronald Hollywood and the author. It presents the author's concern of trouble with Panama if the treaties are not ratified. Hollywood explains the...

  • Development Of The Present U.S. Role In Panama.  // Congressional Digest;Apr76, Vol. 55 Issue 4, p100 

    Focuses on the U.S. government role in construction and administration of the Panama Canal and Canal Zone in Panama. Presentation of the dateline chronology; Ratifications of the Thomson-Urrutia Treaty; Restoration of diplomatic relations.

  • How the Big Ditch Was Dug.  // Time;8/22/1977, Vol. 110 Issue 8, p18 

    The article offers information on how the U.S. canal treaty to Panama came to be. The participation and manipulation of French Bunau-Varilla on the completion of the Panamanian canal where the approval and acceptance of the treaty by the Panama and the U.S. is discussed. Bunau-Varilla who worked...

  • The Proposed Treaty: Preliminary Thoughts.  // National Review;9/2/1977, Vol. 29 Issue 34, p981 

    This article discusses the proposed Panama Canal treaty to be signed by the U.S. and Panama. The Panama Canal is clearly an object of the national pride of the U.S. and rightly so. Conservatives must note that the present terms of the proposed treaty do not include any pejorative interpretation...

  • Should The U.S. Retain Its Present Jurisdiction Over The Panama Canal And Canal Zone? CON.  // Congressional Digest;Apr76, Vol. 55 Issue 4, p125 

    Reports on the approval of the Women's National Democratic Club on the ratification of the Panama Canal Treaty between the U.S. government and Panama. Protection of the interest of the U.S.; Assessment of the domestic policies; Increase of economic interdependence

  • New Treaties and New Symbols.  // America;2/18/1978, Vol. 138 Issue 6, p112 

    The article provides the author's insight on the symbolic representation of the new treaties that will govern the Panama Canal. The author imparts that the canal symbolizes the American engineering skill and the effectiveness of the U.S. government under the Monroe doctrine, while the treaties...

  • Results of the Session.  // America;3/11/1911, Vol. 4 Issue 22, p505 

    The article discusses the highlights of the sixty-first Congress of the U.S. in 1911. The Congress discussed the ratification of the new treaty in Japan. It also tackled the provision of $3,000,000 for fortification of the Panama Canal. There was also the provision of two new battleships. In...

  • Has the Panama Canal a Future? Aragon, Leopoldo // New Republic;7/30/62, Vol. 147 Issue 4/5, p16 

    Focuses on the provisions of a bill introduced by U.S. Senator Warren G. Magnuson granting authorization to Panama Canal Co. to conduct preliminary surveys on possible sites for digging a canal between the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans citing political and economic relations between the two...

  • The Right to Intervene.  // National Review;11/25/1977, Vol. 29 Issue 46, p1347 

    The article focuses on international agreements between Panama and the United States regarding the protection of the Panama Canal's integrity. According to a joint statement issued by the governments of Panama and the U.S., none of the provisions of the Panama Canal treaties should be...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics