TITLE

The Eternal Democratic Majority

PUB. DATE
January 1975
SOURCE
National Review;1/31/1975, Vol. 27 Issue 3, p88
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Discusses a campaign reform legislation that would restrict political contributions in the U.S. Comments on a lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of the bill; Impact of the bill on existing inequalities among political candidates; Comment that eliminating large contributions does not equalize candidates for office but it merely magnifies other inequalities.
ACCESSION #
6055295

 

Related Articles

  • Free Speech and Spending.  // National Review;9/12/1975, Vol. 27 Issue 35, p980 

    The article comments on the lawsuit brought by Senator Buckley and former Senator Eugene McCarthy against the post-Watergate campaign funding law in the U.S. Key issues discussed include restrictions on the ability of political candidates to spend their own money in political campaigns and the...

  • Class-Action Fairness. eEilers-Browser, Heather // Advisor Today;Apr2005, Vol. 100 Issue 4, p30 

    Reports on the approval of legislation to bring a level of integrity to class-action lawsuits in the United States. Requirement for federal courts to hear large lawsuits involving interstate issues; Room for manipulation in the state system; Use of potential exposure to coerce settlements.

  • FPPC sues Midgen for $9M. Bajko, Matthew S. // Bay Area Reporter;3/27/2008, Vol. 38 Issue 13, p1 

    The article reports on a lawsuit filed by California political watchdog agency Fair Political Practices Commission against state Democratic Senator Carole Migden for violating California campaign finance laws.

  • Who's kicking the soft money habit? Merrion, Paul // Crain's Chicago Business;06/23/97, Vol. 20 Issue 25, p3 

    Reports that Chicago companies are finding it hard to say no to making political donations. Decision of some large firms to stop contributions that are exempt from federal campaign limits; Refusal by some of the state's largest contributors to cut contributions.

  • O NEKIM ASPEKTIMA ARBITRAŽNOG RJEÅ AVANJA GRAĐANSKOPRAVNIH SPOROVA. Idriz, Ednar // GodiÅ¡njak Pravnog Fakulteta u Sarajevu;Dec2010, Vol. 53, p165 

    The exact time when the arbitration first occurred cannot be precisely established, but many authors agree that arbitration is as old as the human society. Arbitration was at its bloom and full importance in the Ancient period, particularly in the classic period of the Roman law. In Medieval...

  • National Education Association (NEA), et al., Amici Curiae. O'Brien, Alice // Supreme Court Debates;Nov2013, Vol. 16 Issue 8, p32 

    No abstract available.

  • Citizens United v. FEC. Clift, Eleanor // NonProfit Times;4/1/2010, Vol. 24 Issue 6, p19 

    The article discusses the impact of the U.S. Supreme Court decision on Citizens United v. FEC lifting the caps on the amount of money corporations and unions can spend to promote political candidates. It mentions supporters of the decision like Cleta Mitchell, a partner at the Foley & Lardner...

  • Restraining Arizona. Sullum, Jacob // Reason;Oct2010, Vol. 42 Issue 5, p13 

    The article focuses on the laws related to public funding restrictions of political candidates in the state elections of Arizona and its impact on the freedom of speech.

  • A CASE OF NOBLE INTENTIONS BUT BIZARRE EFFECTS? Taylor Jr., Stuart // National Journal;3/2/2002, Vol. 34 Issue 9, p591 

    Examines the implications of the McCain-Feingold-Shays-Meehan bill for special interests, lobbyists and campaign consultants in the U.S. Maximum amount of individual contribution to congressional candidates; Benefit of the bill; Significance of a 1976 Supreme Court ruling on campaign contributions.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics