Residual Groin Pain at a Minimum of Two Years After Metal-on-Metal THA with a Twenty-eight-Millimeter Femoral Head, THA with a Large-Diameter Femoral Head, and Hip Resurfacing

Lavigne, Martin; Laffosse, Jean-Michel; Ganapathi, Muthu; Girard, Julien; Vendittoli, Pascal
May 2011
Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, American Volume;5/4/2011 Supplement, Vol. 93-A, p93
Academic Journal
Background: Groin pain may persist in up to 4.3% of patients after total hip arthroplasty and up to 18% of patients one year after hip resurfacing. The incidence of this problem after total hip arthroplasty with a large-diameter femoral head is unknown. Methods: We analyzed the natural history of groin pain and its clinical consequences during the first two years after three types of hip arthroplasty. Data were collected prospectively on 279 patients. Eighty-five patients had a polyethylene sandwich metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty with a 28-mm-diameter femoral head, 105 had hip resurfacing, and eightynine had a total hip arthroplasty with a large-diameter femoral head component with three other cup designs (forty-nine in this group had the same monoblock acetabular cup design as those who had hip resurfacing). Results: At the twenty-four-month follow-up evaluation, seventy-seven patients (28%) reported at least one painful area around the hip and thirty-four patients (12.2%) had pain at more than one location. At three months, the incidence of groin discomfort was significantly increased in those who had hip resurfacing (30.5%) and in those who had total hip arthroplasty with a large-diameter femoral head (30%) compared with those who had total hip arthroplasty with a 28-mm femoral head (18.3%). This incidence decreased at two years (14.9%, 16.9%, and 12.9%, respectively). At twenty-four months postoperatively, eleven (four who had hip resurfacing, six who had total hip arthroplasty with the large-diameter head, and one who had total hip arthroplasty with the 28-mm head) of forty-one patients who had groin pain had not reported groin pain at previous follow-up evaluations. Of the forty-one patients reporting groin pain at the time of the last follow-up, twenty-three patients (56%) did not seek further evaluation or treatment, nine had revision surgery (22%), and the remaining nine patients thought the pain was substantial enough to warrant further evaluation and treatment. Conclusions: When the exact source of groin pain cannot be found after total hip arthroplasty, careful follow-up should be done as local reactions to metal-on-metal implants and component loosening may take time to become apparent clinically or on imaging studies. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions to Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.


Related Articles

  • Evolution in Hip Resurfacing Design and Contemporary Experience with an Uncemented Device. Spencer, Robert F. // Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, American Volume;5/4/2011 Supplement, Vol. 93-A, p84 

    The concepts of surface replacement of the hip and metal-on-metal articulation date back to the 1930s, and recent hip resurfacing designs have been more successful than their predecessors. Experience with the Cormet device followed initial collaboration with Mr. Derek McMinn. Both hybrid...

  • A Survey on the Prevalence of Pseudotumors with Metal-on-Metal Hip Resurfacing in Canadian Academic Centers. Beaulé, Paul E. // Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, American Volume;5/4/2011 Supplement, Vol. 93-A, p118 

    Background: Metal-on-metal bearings for hip arthroplasty have been in clinical use for over twenty years with excellent clinical results reported worldwide. A small percentage (<1%) of patients have developed an inflammatory response, and a more severe inflammatory response termed pseudotumor...

  • Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Performed Through the Hueter Interval. Mast, Nicholas H.; Laude, Frédéric // Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, American Volume;5/4/2011 Supplement, Vol. 93-A, p143 

    Revision total hip arthroplasty through the direct anterior approach is technically challenging but offers some advantages in exposure of the acetabulum. This study presents a retrospectively reviewed consecutive series of fifty-one patients who underwent revision total hip arthroplasty through...

  • Comparison of Whole-Blood Metal Ion Levels in Four Types of Metal-on-Metal Large-Diameter Femoral Head Total Hip Arthroplasty: The Potential Influence of the Adapter Sleeve. Lavigne, Martin; Beizile, Etienne L.; Roy, Alain; Morin, François; Amzica, Traian; Vendittoli, Pascal-André // Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, American Volume;5/4/2011 Supplement, Vol. 93-A, p128 

    Background: Metal-on-metal bearings, as used in total hip arthroplasty prostheses that have a large-diameter femoral head, were proposed as an option for treating young and active patients with degenerative hip disorders. Despite the theoretical improved performance of large metal articulations...

  • Comparative Epidemiology of Revision Arthroplasty: Failed THA Poses Greater Clinical and Economic Burdens Than Failed TKA. Bozic, Kevin; Kamath, Atul; Ong, Kevin; Lau, Edmund; Kurtz, Steve; Chan, Vanessa; Vail, Thomas; Rubash, Harry; Berry, Daniel // Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research;Jun2015, Vol. 473 Issue 6, p2131 

    Background: Revision THA and TKA are growing and important clinical and economic challenges. Healthcare systems tend to combine revision joint replacement procedures into a single service line, and differences between revision THA and revision TKA remain incompletely characterized. These...

  • Impingement Between the Acetabular Cup and the Femoral Neck After Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty. Myung Chul Yoo; Yoon Je Cho; Young Soo Chun; Kee Hyung Rhyu // Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, American Volume;5/4/2011 Supplement, Vol. 93-A, p99 

    Background: Loosening, femoral neck fracture, and metal ion release have been well documented after hip resurfacing arthroplasty, but impingement between the acetabular cup and the femoral neck has not. The goal of this study was to analyze radiographic findings that were presumed to represent...

  • Fixation, Survival, and Dislocation of Jumbo Acetabular Components in Revision Hip Arthroplasty. Lachiewicz, Paul F.; Soileau, Elizabeth S. // Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, American Volume;3/20/2013, Vol. 95-A Issue 6, p543 

    Background: Acetabular revision of a total hip arthroplasty using jumbo components (Mayo definition, ≥62 mm in women and ≥66 mm in men) offers distinct advantages in patients with notable acetabular bone loss. However, there are little data on the long-term survival and complications...

  • Accuracy of Acetabular Component Position in Hip Arthroplasty. Barrack, Robert L.; Krempec, Jeffrey A.; Clohisy, John C.; McDonald, Douglas J.; Ricci, William M.; Ruh, Erin L.; Nunley, Ryan M. // Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, American Volume;10/2/2013, Vol. 95-A Issue 19, p1760 

    Background: Acetabular component malposition is linked to higher bearing surface wear and component instability. Outcomes following total hip arthroplasty and surface replacement arthroplasty depend on multiple surgeon and patient-dependent factors. The purpose of this study was to examine the...

  • Increased Risk of Periprosthetic Femur Fractures Associated With a Unique Cementless Stem Design. Watts, Chad; Abdel, Matthew; Lewallen, David; Berry, Daniel; Hanssen, Arlen // Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research;Jun2015, Vol. 473 Issue 6, p2045 

    Background: Postoperative periprosthetic femur fractures are an increasing concern after primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). Identifying and understanding predisposing factors are important to mitigating future risk. Femoral stem design may be one such factor. Questions/purposes: The goals of...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics