TITLE

Mr. A. Goes to Youngstown

AUTHOR(S)
Brookhiser, Richard
PUB. DATE
July 1978
SOURCE
National Review;7/7/1978, Vol. 30 Issue 27, p835
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article analyzes the involvement of Gar Alperovitz, one of the directors of the Exploratory Project for Economic Alternatives, in the Ecumenical Coalition of the Mahoning Valley in Youngstown, Ohio. It also focuses on the proposal of the coalition to resolve the closure of Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co's steel facility through a worker or community ownership. The article further profiles Alperovitz and also mentions about his association with the Community Self-Determination Act. The act called for local Community Development Cooperation.
ACCESSION #
6046188

 

Related Articles

  • Lessons for Labor-Management Cooperation Drawn from Cases of Noncooperation in the French and American Steel Industries or What We Have Heah Is a Failya' to Cooperate. Rothstein, Lawrence E. // Labor Law Journal;Aug89, Vol. 40 Issue 8, p512 

    The article discusses two cases of noncooperation and unilateral employer action in the steel industry. The first case involves the decision of Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. to close Campbell Works in Youngstown, Ohio, followed by the closure of Brier Hill Works and US Steel Group's Youngstown...

  • The Steel Crisis in Youngstown. MURPHY, RICHARD // America;4/29/1978, Vol. 138 Issue 16, p342 

    The article deals with the impact of the closure of most of the Campbell Works steel plant of the Youngstown Sheet and Tube Co. in Youngstown, Ohio on September 19, 1977. The company laid off a total of 5,000 workers. The move is anticipated to have a ripple effect in steel-related industries....

  • The Youngstown Experience. Alperovitz, Gar // Challenge (05775132);Jul/Aug78, Vol. 21 Issue 3, p21 

    The article presents an interview of Gar Alperovitz, the coordinator of the National Center for Economic Alternatives. He has been asked the background of the study made by the National Center for Economic Alternatives of the feasibility of community and employee ownership of steel facilities in...

  • Assist.  // Time;Jan1951, Vol. 57 Issue 1, p62 

    The article reports on the decision of Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. to expand its East Chicago mill in Indiana in December 1955 in order to improve steel production.

  • The Man On The Moon: PROFIT MOTIVE AND CHANGE. Williams, Robert E. // Vital Speeches of the Day;8/1/65, Vol. 31 Issue 20, p624 

    Presents the text of a speech given by Robert E. Williams, executive vice president of the Youngstown Sheet and Tube Co., on March 11, 1965, which deals with the challenging issues of technological change.

  • AMERICA beyond CAPITALISM. Alperovitz, Gar // Dollars & Sense;Nov/Dec2011, Issue 297, p15 

    The author discusses the forced institutional innovation which suggests further possibilities for larger-scale and more refined development in the U.S. An overview of the 1977 Youngstown initiative which involved a community-worker ownership of the Youngstown Sheet and Tube steel mill in Ohio is...

  • Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer.  // Supreme Court Cases: The Dynamic Court (1930-1999);1999, pN.PAG 

    Presents the case Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer argued before the United States Supreme Court. Opening statements; Decision of the Court; Comments by the judges.

  • Court Ruling on Steel Mill Seizure. Schlesinger jr., Arthur M.; Israel, Fred L.; Frent, David J. // Election of 1948 & the Administration of Harry S. Truman;2003, p116 

    This article focuses on the case of Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer (1952), which is one of the classic confrontations in American history between the president and the Supreme Court. During the Korean War, a labor dispute in the steel industry was referred to the Federal Wage...

  • Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. et al. v. Sawyer.  // Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. et al. v. Sawyer;8/1/2017, p1 

    Presents the case Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. et al. v. Sawyer argued before the United States Supreme Court in May of 1952. Arguments made by both sides of the case; Judgment of the Court; Comments made by Judges.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics