TITLE

Grantsmanship

PUB. DATE
June 1975
SOURCE
National Review;6/6/1975, Vol. 27 Issue 21, p595
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article reports on the government research grants received by the National Science Foundation (NSF). It states that the projects under the NSF which includes a creation of a banana peeling machine and a grant to study passion is a big waste of taxpayer's money. Senator Proxmire, Edith Green and the National Taxpayer's Union suggest that there is a fundamental problem on how the government awards the grants.
ACCESSION #
6045985

 

Related Articles

  • Industry Retakes Leadership Role. Duga, Jules; Grueber, Martin; Studt, Tim // R&D Magazine;Jan2007, Vol. 49 Issue 1, pF3 

    The article presents information on the funding forecast for research and development (R&D) in the U.S. in 2007. It states that sources of funding include federal government and private industry. Databases that contain information on sources of R&D funding were maintained by the National Science...

  • Ah, Sweet Mystery.  // Time;3/24/1975, Vol. 105 Issue 12, p68 

    The article reports on U.S. Senator William Proxmire's critiques on issues perpetrated by the National Science Foundation which funded six dubitable studies, as well as the controversial contract by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development to study the sex lives of Michigan...

  • How the National Science Foundation Funds Research in Economics. Wachtel, Howard // Challenge (05775132);Sep/Oct2000, Vol. 43 Issue 5, p20 

    As the premier government-funding agency for economic research, the National Science Foundation (NSF) has enormous influence over the direction and development of economics as an academic discipline. To understand the NSF funding process, the author decided to investigate whom NSF funds and how...

  • National Science Foundation reports on federal R&D.  // Advanced Materials & Processes;Mar2007, Vol. 165 Issue 3, p17 

    The article reports on National Science Foundation data about U.S. government funding for research and development (R & D) in 2004. Federal agencies spent nearly $110 billion on R & D that year, with almost half going to research. The National Institutes of Health provided much of the research...

  • National science furore.  // Nature Physics;Jun2013, Vol. 9 Issue 6, p315 

    The author discusses settlement of a resolution for the U.S. government's expenses for the fiscal year 2013 in scientific research. It offers information on 85 billion dollar reduction in the scientific expenditure including most of the science agencies. It also states the high quality research...

  • House votes to double NSF budget; is DOE next in line?  // Issues in Science & Technology;Fall2002, Vol. 19 Issue 1, p22 

    Reports on the passage of the Investing in America's Future Act by the U.S. House of Representatives in 2002, which would launch the National Science Foundation. Budget for the foundation; Focus of the bill; Introduction of a bill that would increase the budget of the Department of Energy...

  • National Science Foundation facing budget let-down. Brumfiel, Geoff // Nature;12/11/2003, Vol. 426 Issue 6967, p593 

    Reports on science advocates in the United States' disappointment over the appropriated budget for the National Science Foundation (NSF). Percentage increase in the NSF total budget under the omnibus appropriations bill which sets 2004 funding levels; Budget for the NSF recommended in a bill...

  • NSF releases report detailing nationwide and state-by-state R&D activities.  // Biomedical Market Newsletter;8/28/2012, Vol. 21, p1 

    The article focuses on a report released by the U.S. National Science Foundation which found a seven per cent increase over the fiscal 2007 in the state agency expenditures for R&D in fiscal year 2009.

  • Foundation awards of funds for antarctic projects, 28 November 1992 to 1 March 1993.  // Antarctic Journal of the United States;1993, Vol. 28 Issue 2, p19 

    Lists National Science Foundation antarctic awards made from November 28 1992 to March 1, 1993. Categories; Award description.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics