New Practitioners Forum. Writing a review article

LaRochelle, Joseph M.; King, Allison R.; Tanas, Majid; Day, Kimberly; Marshall, Helen M.
May 2011
American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy;5/1/2011, Vol. 68 Issue 9, p790
Academic Journal
The article offers information for pharmacy practitioners on how to write review articles. It explains the initial steps, especially the purpose of a review article, and mentions that peer-reviewed journals refer authors to the Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals. Procedural details pertaining to conducting a literature review, writing and organizing the article, and submitting the review are also discussed.


Related Articles

  • The role of the researcher as a producer and reviewer of scientific papers. Marziale, Maria Helena Palucci // Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem (RLAE);Mar/Apr2012, Vol. 20 Issue 2, p215 

    No abstract available.

  • The Mumbo Jumbo of Academic Writing. Lasley, Julie // Radiation Therapist;Spring2013, Vol. 22 Issue 1, p113 

    The article discusses problems with poor academic writing, illustrates common mistakes writers make, and offers solutions for improvement. It comments on the writings of various professors and states that according to the American Psychological Association, an open and fair assessment of writing...

  • Writing a letter to the editor. Dotson, Bryan // American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy;1/15/2013, Vol. 70 Issue 2, p96 

    The article provides tips to new authors on how to write effective letters to the editor. It is mentioned that new authors can write letters to the editor which will provide them with experience for scientific writing and publishing. The article suggests that authors must keep in mind the...

  • Responding to reviewers' comments as part of writing for publication. Happell, Brenda // Nurse Researcher;2011, Vol. 18 Issue 4, p23 

    Aims The aim of this paper is to provide a resource for authors to help them in getting their work published. The focus is on dealing with, and responding to, the comments of reviewers. Background The importance to research of nurses writing for publication is widely acknowledged. However, a...

  • Authors, editors and ethical ways of working. Gallagher, Ann // Nursing Ethics;Jun2015, Vol. 22 Issue 4, p397 

    The article offers suggestions for authors and editors on understanding the editorial process. Topics discussed include finding the timescale of publication, following the guidelines for authors and responding to reviewers' comments as advised on the letter from the editor. It also welcomes new...

  • The Gauntlet of Peer Review. Toomasian, John M // Perfusion;Sep2013, Vol. 28 Issue 5, p376 

    The article offers information on the challenges of conducting reviews of studies conducted by peers. The author states that peer review endorses the work and elevates the sophistication of the journal. Given example is the journal "Perfusion" which uses two reviewers per manuscript. According...

  • xxx. Voight, Michael L.; Hoogenboom, Barbara J. // International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy;Oct2012, Vol. 7 Issue 5, p452 

    Manuscripts have been subjected to the peer review process prior to publication for over 300 years. Currently, the peer review process is used by almost all scientific journals, and The International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy is no exception. Scholarly publication is the means by which...

  • AVOIDING MANUSCRIPT MISTAKES. Grindstaff, Terry L.; Saliba, Susan A. // International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy;Oct2012, Vol. 7 Issue 5, p518 

    Writing a scientific manuscript can be a consuming, but rewarding task with a number of intrinsic and extrinsic benefits. The ability to write a scientific manuscript is typically not an emphasized component of most entry-level professional programs. The purpose of this overview is to provide...

  • For the write reason. Shanahan, Daniel // Journal of Wound Care;Oct2012, Vol. 21 Issue 10, p467 

    The article reflects on the purpose of writing for publication. He states that writers publish to gain the personal achievement. He also presents two main reasons behind it are to keep the research on the memory of the people also to reach the research to a wider audience influencing changes in...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics