TITLE

JOB REINSTATEMENT UNDER SECTION 8(a)(3) of the NLRA

AUTHOR(S)
Aspin, Les
PUB. DATE
March 1971
SOURCE
Monthly Labor Review;Mar71, Vol. 94 Issue 3, p57
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Focuses on Section 8(a)(3) of the U.S. National Labor Relations Act. Protection of workers' exercise of full freedom of association, self-organization and designation of representatives of their own choosing; Requirement of employers found in violation of the section to reinstate workers who lost their jobs as a result of the employer's unlawful conduct.
ACCESSION #
6018233

 

Related Articles

  • Financial Difficulties No Reason to Omit Backpay.  // Labor Law Journal;Feb83, Vol. 34 Issue 2, p127 

    The article informs that faced with heavy financial losses, an employer made changes in wages, laid off workers, and changed the seniority system without bargaining with labor union, and in that case an administrative law judge ordered the employer to offer reinstatement to the employees but did...

  • REMEDIES DOCTRINES IN EMPLOYMENT LAW: READY TO BE RESTATED, OR IN NEED OF REMEDIAL ATTENTION? COVINGTON, ROBERT // Employee Rights & Employment Policy Journal;2012, Vol. 16 Issue 2, p511 

    The article focuses on employee restatement laws of the U.S. and also offers information on the reason of dissatisfaction among employees along with an analysis of legal framework formed for providing employee rights. It discusses the challenges involved in applying general concepts of law in...

  • Consultorio Laboral. Ángel, Miguel; Pineda, Morcillo // Capital Humano;Sep2012, Vol. 25 Issue 268, p114 

    No abstract available.

  • FAMILY AND MEDICAL LEAVE ACT: STILL A TANGLE WEB. Calhoon, Melissa; Berkeley, Daniel T. // Hospitality Upgrade;Spring2003, p120 

    The article looks at the obligations of employers within the hospitality industry under the federal Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) and similar legislation in the U.S. It is inferred that FMLA and other related laws is to provide qualified employees rights to leave and reinstatement after...

  • Employee Strike at Bajaj Auto (Chakan Plant): A Chronology of Events. Sharma, Gunjan Mohan; Jyothi, M. // Indian Journal of Industrial Relations;Oct2013, Vol. 49 Issue 2, p357 

    A harmonious employer-employee relationship is achieved through prevention and settlement of industrial disputes, mutual understanding and strict enforcement of labor laws in the industrial establishments. Recently, Bajaj Auto faced a 50 days long strike at their Chakan manufacturing plant....

  • AN EXCURSION THROUGH STRANGE TERRAIN: CHAPTERS 6 (DEFAMATION) AND 7 (PRIVACY AND AUTONOMY). FINKIN, MATTHEW W. // Employee Rights & Employment Policy Journal;2012, Vol. 16 Issue 2, p465 

    The article focuses on employee restatement laws in the U.S. and discusses the legal provisions for defamation, privacy and autonomy. It reports that the law asserts that an employer owes a duty to a prospective employer to not providing false information in a matter in which the prior employer...

  • WHAT SHOULD THE PROPOSED RESTATEMENT OF EMPLOYMENT LAW SAY ABOUT REMEDIES? HYDE, ALAN // Employee Rights & Employment Policy Journal;2012, Vol. 16 Issue 2, p497 

    The article focuses on the employee restatement laws and offers information on employment litigation associated with the issues. It emphasizes the need of including information sharing agreement in job agreement documents and also offers information on a study conducted by legal expert Kate...

  • LABOR -- AWARD -- REINSTATEMENT WITHOUT BACK-PAY NOT IN EXCESS OF ARBITRATOR'S AUTHORITY.  // Arbitration Journal;Dec72, Vol. 27 Issue 4, p293 

    This article evaluates the actions of an employee, who had been reinstated with seniority, in his efforts to seek back wages contending that the contract made such a recovery necessary when the discharge had been found unjust. The employer sought to interpose the award as a final determination....

  • MOTION TO VACATE -- CPLR 7511 (a) -- DATE OF DELIVERY CONTROLS TIMELINESS.  // Arbitration Journal;Dec72, Vol. 27 Issue 4, p294 

    This article reports that the Appellate Division has reinstated the motion to vacate, the date of delivery of the award not having been affirmatively shown.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics