TITLE

Replaced strikers as 'employees'

PUB. DATE
September 1970
SOURCE
Monthly Labor Review;Sep70, Vol. 93 Issue 9, p50
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Reports that the federal court of appeals has upheld the U.S. National Labor Relations Board's policy of including permanently replaced strikers in the bargaining unit when the nation's majority status is challenged. National Labor Relations Act's definition of employee; Implications of the policy.
ACCESSION #
6015899

 

Related Articles

  • STRIKES IN BREACH OF AGREEMENT.  // Labor Law Journal;Aug50, Vol. 1 Issue 11, p901 

    The article focuses on the rulings of the U.S. National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) on the strikes in breach of agreements. It is reported in the article that when a union abandons a strike conducted in breach of its collective bargaining agreement with the employer and the strikers return to...

  • RIGHTS OF ECONOMIC STRIKERS.  // Labor Law Journal;Aug50, Vol. 1 Issue 11, p901 

    The article sheds lights on the legal provisions related to the rights of economic strikers in the United States. It reports on the observation of a trial examiner of the National Labor Relations Board of the United States, who stated that an employer which filled vacancies by transferring...

  • The Changing Character of Strikes Involving Permanent Striker Replacements, 1935-1990. LeROY, MICHAEL H. // Journal of Labor Research;Fall95, Vol. 16, p423 

    Using NLRB cases reporting hiring of striker replacements, I provide a longitudinal analysis of 165 strikes from 1935-1990. Strikes since 1981 most closely resembled strikes occurring from 1938-1947: They lasted longer and involved more strikers and more replacements than strikes in the 1950s,...

  • Withdrawal of Union Recognition: Good-Faith Doubt After Curtin Matheson Scientific. Stephens, Elvis C.; Vaught, Bobby; Robinson, Robert // Labor Law Journal;Apr91, Vol. 42 Issue 4, p221 

    The paper examines two crucial defenses in challenges to union majority support, arguments of good-faith doubt and the submission of substantial evidence. On April 12, 1981, the Johns-Manville Corporation's union, Machinist District Lodge 115, Local Lodge 1549, conducted an economic strike...

  • Response: Confronting Unjust Labor Law is Key. Burns, Joe // Labor Studies Journal;Dec2012, Vol. 37 Issue 4, p353 

    The article replies to responses by Joseph McCartin and Stephen Ashby to the author's article "Labor’s Economic Weapons: Learning from Labor History" in the same issue, which argues that U.S. labor unions need to strike more frequently in order to rebuild their strength. Topics include...

  • 'Privitization' and Labor Relations: Some Welcome Guidance from the NLRB. Locke, Keltnor W. // Labor Law Journal;Mar87, Vol. 38 Issue 3, p166 

    Discusses the U.S. National Labor Relations Board's decision on the collective bargaining rights of privatized institutions under the National Labor Relations Act. Complications that made it difficult to apply the right of control test; Implicit assumption that some employees providing...

  • Strike-Misconduct Discharge Stands Despite Back-to-Work Offer.  // Labor Law Journal;Mar70, Vol. 21 Issue 3, p186 

    This article focuses on a case involving strikers against Ohio Stove Co. For two of the strikers, it lasted only a few minutes, before their suspension, and was followed the next day by an investigation of the misconduct. Later, one who had led the strike was discharged. In holding the discharge...

  • The Longest Strike in U.S. Professional Sports History: Jai Alai -- Part I (?). Balfour, Alan // Labor Law Journal;Jul90, Vol. 41 Issue 7, p394 

    The article focuses on the strike of the players of the International Jai Alai Players Association in the U.S. The strike directly involves the Association, eight different employers in three different states, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), two other federal agencies, three state...

  • Suggestions to Management: The Lockout. Lev, Edward R. // Labor Law Journal;Feb68, Vol. 19 Issue 2, p80 

    The article suggests that employers who wish to try out the lockout should do so only under carefully controlled conditions. The U.S. Supreme Court held in the case of "American Ship Building Company v. National Labor Relations Board," that an employer does not violate Section 8(a)(1) and (3) of...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics