TITLE

Significant Decisions in Labor Cases

PUB. DATE
August 1967
SOURCE
Monthly Labor Review;Aug67, Vol. 90 Issue 8, p58
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Summarizes court rulings on labor cases in the United States, compiled as of August 1967. U.S. Supreme Court ruling stating that a striking union did not commit an unfair labor practice when it imposed fines upon some of its members for crossing the picket line to work; Review of court decisions concerning the allocation of the burden of proof in employer discrimination cases.
ACCESSION #
6015742

 

Related Articles

  • Concerted Activities--Protected and Unprotected--II. Petro, Sylvester // Labor Law Journal;Jan51, Vol. 2 Issue 1, p3 

    The article explains Taft-Hartley Act and some cases decided under the act. The act was designed at least to maintain the qualifications, which the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) and the courts, operating under the Wagner Act, had placed on the right to engage in concerted activities....

  • JURISDICTIONAL STRIKES.  // Labor Law Journal;Sep50, Vol. 1 Issue 12, p976 

    This article reports on two cases related to jurisdictional labor disputes in the U.S. Under Section 10(k) of the jurisdictional-dispute procedure provision of the Taft-Hartley Act, the U.S. National Labor Relations Board does not need to make a finding that a union has violated Section 8...

  • Legislation on strike replacements. Lissy, William E. // Supervision;Nov93, Vol. 54 Issue 11, p20 

    Examines a bill passed by the House that would prohibit employers from hiring permanent replacement for strikers. Labor law; Reaction of business groups; Offensive not equal with illegal; Obscene outburst not protected. INSET: In a nutshell..

  • Striker Replacement (S 55, HR 5).  // Human Events;7/10/93, Vol. 53 Issue 28, p4 

    Presents the enactment of Striker Replacement bill by the House and its possible consequences. Prohibition of permanent jobs for replacement workers during strikes; Favorable prospects for Senate counterpart; Increase union bosses' clout; Increase number and duration of crippling strikes;...

  • It's win--or else. Verespej, Michael A. // Industry Week/IW;7/19/93, Vol. 242 Issue 14, p61 

    Discusses the striker-replacement legislative battle between labor and management. Statement from United Steel Workers of America president Lynn Williams; Passing of a bill prohibiting companies from hiring permanent strike replacements at the House.

  • Clinton's striker replacement executive order put on hold. Lesher, Richard L. // Human Events;10/6/95, Vol. 51 Issue 38, p17 

    Reports that the Clinton administration's executive order barring federal contractors from hiring permanent striker replacements was blocked by a federal judge on July 31, 1995. Lawsuit filed by the US Chamber of Commerce, Bridgestone/Firestone, Mosler Safe Company and other business groups;...

  • Select advice for employers. Aikin, Olga // People Management;8/30/2001, Vol. 7 Issue 17, p20 

    Deals with the effect on employers brought about by the Sex Discrimination Regulations 2001 which widens the definition of indirect discrimination and shifts the burden of proof towards the employer in Great Britain. Overview of the British law on discrimination before the approval of the...

  • Supreme court ruling on age discrimination. Lissy, William E. // Supervision;Sep96, Vol. 57 Issue 9, p17 

    Presents labor laws and legislation. Ruling that a terminated employee can sue under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act even if their replacement is also 40 or older; Infertility as disability under the Americans With Disabilities Act; Admission of electronic mail messages as evidence of...

  • Rulings in age cases call for caution. Zachary, Mary-Kathryn // Supervision;Dec97, Vol. 58 Issue 12, p19 

    Focuses on a labor law in the United States that prohibits age-based discrimination against individuals in a protected class. Background on several age discrimination cases; Family work conflicts that may be regulated by employer; Employee's protected age category in the act.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sign out of this library

Other Topics