TITLE

Improving arbitration: roles of parties and agencies

AUTHOR(S)
Power, James F.
PUB. DATE
November 1972
SOURCE
Monthly Labor Review;Nov72, Vol. 95 Issue 11, p15
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Examines the roles of parties and agencies in improving labor arbitration in the United States. Problems in labor arbitration; Innovations in the arbitration process provided by agencies that provide arbitration services; Role of arbitrators in efforts to improve the process. INSET: THE ARBIT SYSTEM.
ACCESSION #
6013378

 

Related Articles

  • JEKYLL AND HYDE: THE SPLIT PERSONALITIES OF A PUBLIC SECTOR ARBITRATOR. Deitsch, Clarence R. // Journal of Collective Negotiations in the Public Sector;2003, Vol. 30 Issue 1, p15 

    Explores the tension between decisional arbitrational principles and the arbitrator's basic sense of fairness. Possible conflict on the jurisdiction construction principle; Conflict resolution; Arbitrator Daugherty's seven tests.

  • AN EXPLORATORY ANALYSIS OF THE SELECTION OF ARBITRATORS IN COMPULSORY INTEREST ARBITRATION PROCEEDINGS: THE MICHIGAN EXPERIENCE. Swift, Maris Stella; Johnson, Brian R.; Posthuma, Rick // Journal of Collective Negotiations in the Public Sector;2003, Vol. 30 Issue 1, p77 

    Discusses selection of arbitrators in Michigan. Compulsory arbitration; Arbitration process administered by the Michigan Employment Relations Commission; Characteristics of arbitrators.

  • A tentative decision-making model of the strong and weak forces at labor arbitration. Crow, Stephen M.; Logan, James // Journal of Collective Negotiations in the Public Sector;1995, Vol. 24 Issue 2, p111 

    Discusses how strong and weak forces may interact to influence the arbitral decision-making process. Characteristics of arbitrators; Interplay of arbitrary and grievant gender; Impact of personal values; Award orientation; Arbitral decision-making model.

  • Winners and loosers: A multivariate content analysis of Israel's tribunal for voluntary arbitration. Kirschenbaum, Alan; Harel, Gedaliahu; Sivan, Niza // Relations Industrielles / Industrial Relations;Spring98, Vol. 53 Issue 2, p342 

    Examines voluntary arbitration processes which are instituted in arbitration tribunals. Information on institutionalized voluntary arbitration; What arbitration agreements require; Reason voluntary arbitration is a choice by parties to a labour dispute.

  • Compulsory arbitration of non-union employment disputes. Zigarelli, Michael A. // Human Resource Management Review;Fall96, Vol. 6 Issue 3, p183 

    Presents an overview of the law and literature on the arbitration of non-union employment disputes in the United States. Effects of costly legal battles and proliferating causes of action for employer misconduct; Highlights of the case filed by Robert Gilmer, a financial services manager...

  • Arbitration in practice: A profile of public sector arbitration cases. Mesch, Debra J.; Shamayeva, Olga // Public Personnel Management;Spring96, Vol. 25 Issue 1, p119 

    Describes the types of public sector arbitration cases and the pattern of case resolutions. Categories of arbitration cases; Dependence of outcome on type of grievance; Disciplinary cases in the public sector.

  • The Impact of Delay on Arbitrators' Decisions in Discharge Cases. Nelson, Nels E.; Uddin, A.N.M. Meshquat // Labor Studies Journal;Summer98, Vol. 23 Issue 2, p3 

    Examines the impact of delay in the arbitration off discharge cases. Studies on the decision-making process of labor arbitrators; Effect on the reinstatement of a grievant; Implications to labor arbitration.

  • The law at work.  // Monthly Labor Review;Jan/Feb96, Vol. 119 Issue 1/2, p79 

    Discusses issues concerning the debate over greater reliance on labor arbitration. Speed advantage of arbitration; Placing of limits to recovery; Costs of arbitration compared to litigation; Standards of quality recommended to ensure that results of arbitration are accurate and fair.

  • Section 10 (a) and Arbitrators' Awards. Singer, Morton // Labor Law Journal;Nov53, Vol. 4 Issue 11, p727 

    Focuses on the United States National Labor Relations Board's attitude on permitting labor and management to settle their own differences through the grievance procedure. Contents of the Section 10 (a) of the Labor Management Relations Act of 1947.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics