Train layoff delay urged

July 1972
Monthly Labor Review;Jul72, Vol. 95 Issue 7, p50
Academic Journal
Reports on a recommendation by a U.S. government panel that the Penn Central delay its planned reduction in train crews for at least 8 months. Company's announcement of its plans in mid-March 1972; Threat of retaliation from the United Transportation Union.


Related Articles

  • Penn Central manning dispute. Bornstein, Leon // Monthly Labor Review;Aug72, Vol. 95 Issue 8, p59 

    Focuses on a labor case involving bankrupt railroad firm, Penn Central Transportation Corp. Railroad trustees' collective bargaining efforts with the United Transportation Union; Trade-union's concern about status of its manning contract with Penn Central.

  • Railroads, UTU said near deal in contract talks on agreement that could set industry pattern. Burke, Jack // Traffic World;12/4/95, Vol. 244 Issue 10, p49 

    Reports on the negotiations between the United Transportation Union (UTU) and the National Railway Labor Conference for a deal aimed at preventing rail work stoppages of 1991 and 1992. Significance of the contract talks; Timetable of negotiations.

  • Under Control. Gallagher, John // Traffic World;10/15/2001, Vol. 265 Issue 42, p35 

    Reports the agreement between the United Transportation Union and the railroads concerning the assigning of employees to work on remote control operations in the United States. Terms in the agreement; Concept of the remote control operation; Factors on the resistance of Unions on the use of...

  • Penn Central proposal for downtown Scarsdale delayed until fall. McBride, Caryn A. // Westchester County Business Journal;7/26/93, Vol. 32 Issue 30, p5 

    Focuses on the delayed discussions of Mayor Walter J. Handelman and the village Board of Trustees of Scarsdale for the development of the Freightway-Depot Place by the Penn Central Corp. Schedule for resumption of discussions; Two proposed projects for the site; Preliminary stages; Priorities.

  • Are Labor and Management Headed for Another Showdown? Wilner, Frank N. // Railway Age;Sep99, Vol. 200 Issue 9, p20 

    Discusses issues surrounding the railway industry. Findings about the rail employees; Details on the battle between the Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and the United Transportation Union.

  • UTU wants to improve member benefit packages.  // Railway Age;Aug97, Vol. 198 Issue 8, p30 

    Focuses on the Railroad Employee National Health and Welfare plans to be launched by the United Transportation Union. Benefits included in the plan; How the rising costs of the benefits program will be controlled.

  • UTU wins vote at Fla. railroad.  // Traffic World;12/20/93, Vol. 236 Issue 12, p27 

    Reports on the United Transportation Union's winning of accreditation to represent train and engine service employees on the Florida East Coast Railroad (FEC). Counting of ballots submitted by FEC employees by the National Mediation Board.

  • Unions, railroads kick off bargaining; crew consist, basic day top issues. Burke, Jack // Traffic World;11/7/94, Vol. 240 Issue 6, p19 

    Reports on the serving of notices necessary to negotiations in the United States rail industry. Bargaining with the United Transportation Union; National negotiations that force job action; Cost-sharing of health and welfare benefits.

  • Union official takes aim. Barnes, David // Traffic World;12/01/97, Vol. 252 Issue 9, p30 

    Presents the views of United Transportation Union (UTU) national legislative director James Brunkenhoefer on the infighting among unions in the railroad transportation sector in the United States. Appeal for unions to solve their internal problems to maintain public trust; Factors behind feud...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics