Significant Decisions in Labor Cases

April 1968
Monthly Labor Review;Apr68, Vol. 91 Issue 4, p56
Academic Journal
Highlights several labor cases in the United States as of April 1968. Inclusion of a court of appeals' consideration of accommodating the Norris LaGuardia Act's prohibition against the issuance of federal court injunctions in labor disputes; Unfair labor practices of Spartan's Industries Inc.'s chain of retail stores according to the U.S. National Labor Relations Board (NLRB).


Related Articles

  • Whistleblowers protected in varied settings. Zachry, Mary-Kathryn // Supervision;Mar98, Vol. 59 Issue 3, p17 

    Features several court cases in the United States that illustrates the consequences of taking action against an employee who has provided information that is detrimental to the company or to individual supervisors. Firing of an employee who had been accused of sexual harassment; Reassigning of...

  • Arbitrate or out! Wilkins, Richard D. // Business Journal Serving Southern Tier, CNY, Mohawk Valley, Fing;2/5/96, Vol. 10 Issue 3, p1 

    Reports on the increase in employment litigation in the United States. Number of complaints received by the US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC); Efforts being made to keep employment disputes out of the court; Encouragement of the growing use of arbitration; Advantages of arbitration.

  • Significant Decisions in Labor Cases.  // Monthly Labor Review;Sep74, Vol. 97 Issue 9, p57 

    Discusses court decisions in several labor cases in the United States. Impact of a U.S. Supreme Court decision on management policy on the selection of supervisory personnel on the case; Supreme Court ruling exempting the word `scab' from libel coverage; Court's 1966 decision in Linn v. Plant...

  • Labor-management relations.  // Labor Law Journal;Jan78, Vol. 29 Issue 1, p63 

    This article presents an overview of recent employment cases in the U.S. in 1978. The Labor Department discovered some 628,000 workers who were due some back pay in fiscal year 1977. About 370,000 employees received less than the minimum wage to which they were entitled and had some $37 million...

  • Sign on the dotted line. Spitzer, Vlad G. // Fairfield County Business Journal;08/09/99, Vol. 38 Issue 32, p15 

    Focuses on employment contracts as a valuable tool for lawyers to use in court proceedings in the United States. Law's redefining of employment relationships in the workplace; Employment at will as the rule in most jurisdictions; Employment litigation as one of the fastest growing dockets in...

  • Legal Briefs.  // HR Specialist: Employment Law;Oct2011, Vol. 40 Issue 10, p3 

    The article offers legal news briefs in the U.S. dealing with industrial relations as of October 2011 including court cases Cooper v. Smithfield Packing Co. Inc., Grace v. Family Dollar Stores Inc., and Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) v. Hurricane Grill & Wings in Florida.

  • Check calendar when employee files lawsuit covered by employment agreement.  // HR Specialist: North Carolina Employment Law;Nov2009, Vol. 3 Issue 11, p3 

    The article discusses a court case wherein the plaintiff was terminated since she made a gesture to her supervisor after being transferred to another shift. She claimed that she had been terminated in retaliation for complaining. The court dismissed her first claim for not filing a lawsuit...

  • Better communication is key to avoiding costly lawsuits. Gagnon, Louise // Dermatology Times;Sep2006, Vol. 27 Issue 9, p92 

    The article discusses the topic of the Pacific Northwest Dermatology conference involving all dermatologist in private practice on the significance of communication to avoid lawsuits against an employer in the U.S. The tips cited, include the requirement to follow the five golden rules of...

  • Union Cannot Represent Both Active and Retired Workers.  // Labor Law Journal;Sep86, Vol. 37 Issue 9, p680 

    The article discusses two cases related to industrial relations in the United States. In the case of "Century Brass Products Inc.," the Second Circuit held that as a matter of law, a union had a conflict of interest in representing both active and retired workers in negotiations to modify a...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics