TITLE

Significant Decisions in Labor Cases

PUB. DATE
March 1967
SOURCE
Monthly Labor Review;Mar67, Vol. 90 Issue 3, p52
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Reports on decisions in several labor dispute cases in the U.S. as of March 1967. Decision of the National Labor Relations Board to discard the restrictive tests for craft unit determination; Decisions handed by the Supreme Court involving an employer's duty to bargain; Unauthorized practice of law engaged in by a labor union.
ACCESSION #
6009131

 

Related Articles

  • NLRB widens the 'bargaining unit'  // Banking;Apr74, Vol. 66 Issue 10, p14 

    Talks about a ruling set by the U.S. National Labor Relations Board in a contest between a union and a bank in the U.S. as of April 1974. Details on the case of the Office and Professional Employees International Union and the Central National Bank & Trust Co.; Discussion on the determination...

  • Collective Bargaining Units in the Transportation Industry. Grady, James T. // Labor Law Journal;Feb78, Vol. 29 Issue 2, p118 

    The article discusses briefly the statutory and judicial framework which provides the context for the National Labor Relations Board's (NLRB) development of the law of the unit appropriate for the purpose of collective bargaining. Sections 9(a) and (b) of the National Labor Relations Act provide...

  • The Employer's Duty to Bargain On Termination of Unit Work. Gacek, Stanley A. // Labor Law Journal;Oct81, Vol. 32 Issue 10, p659 

    Analyzes historical development of a law governing an employer's duty to bargain with a union over decisions terminating bargaining unit work as defined by the National Labor Relations Board and the federal courts in the United States. Concern about decision-bargaining law; Potential of being...

  • UNIT SIZE AND UNION SUCCESS IN REPRESENTATION ELECTIONS. Chaison, Gary N. // Monthly Labor Review;Feb73, Vol. 96 Issue 2, p51 

    Comments on the influence of unit-related variables and prior organizing history on the outcome of trade-union representation elections conducted by the National Labor Relations Board in the U.S. Relationship between unit size and union success in representation elections; Policy implications...

  • labor-management relations.  // Labor Law Journal;Feb78, Vol. 29 Issue 2, p126 

    The article focuses on the recent developments related to the field of labor-management relations in the U.S. The Seventh Circuit ruled that recognitional picketing is unlawful after it is determined that no National Labor Relations Board (NLRB)-conducted election will be held. Thus, a union...

  • Bargaining Order Remedies Employer's Interference with Union.  // Labor Law Journal;Apr68, Vol. 19 Issue 4, p254 

    This article presents the decision of the U.S. National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) concerning a labor dispute on collective bargaining. Although a union had not charged an employer with unlawfully refusing to bargain, it came away from an unfair labor practice proceeding with an NLRB order...

  • Employer's Stance on Union Shop Clause Is Coercive.  // Labor Law Journal;Jan71, Vol. 22 Issue 1, p56 

    The article focuses on the decision of the U.S. National Labor Relations Board concerning an employer's stance on a union shop, in 1971. An employer's preelection remarks to the effect that it would never agree to a union shop, which was insisted upon by a union, were unlawful, according to the...

  • Union Assurances Do Not Constitute No-Strike Pledge.  // Labor Law Journal;Jan71, Vol. 22 Issue 1, p57 

    The articles discusses the decision of the U.S. National Labor Relations Board concerning the interpretation of union assurances. A union's assurance that, if bargaining went satisfactorily, it would try to avoid any work stoppage was not a binding no-strike pledge. It was the board's opinion,...

  • Union Gets Information on Payments to Retirees.  // Labor Law Journal;Jan71, Vol. 22 Issue 1, p58 

    The article deals with the refusal of an employer to give a labor union access to information about the payments made to retired employees and the extent of their disability. In so holding, the U.S. National Labor Relations Board refused to reverse its decision in the case of Pittsburgh Plate...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of NEW JERSEY STATE LIBRARY

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics