TITLE

Strategies for Decentralization

AUTHOR(S)
Weber, Arnold R.
PUB. DATE
December 1966
SOURCE
Monthly Labor Review;Dec66, Vol. 89 Issue 12, p1386
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Identifies strategies for decentralizing collective bargaining decision-making in the United States. Agitation for structural changes; Steps to decentralize the bargaining process into independent negotiating units; Modification of trade-union structure to improve representation.
ACCESSION #
6008913

 

Related Articles

  • Partition function bargaining with public demands. Cornet, Maarten F. // Economic Theory;2003, Vol. 22 Issue 4, p845 

    In the partition function bargaining problem the value of a coalition depends on the coalition structure in which it is embedded. This paper applies the demand-making bargaining game of coalition formation to the three-player partition function bargaining problem. The values of some embedded...

  • Public-Private Differences and the Assessment of Alternatives for Decision Making. Nutt, Paul C. // Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory;Apr99, Vol. 9 Issue 2, p305 

    Discusses public-private differences and the assessment of alternatives for decision making. Details of the study; Finding that decision makers in public organizations were more successful when they sought out expert views and used hard data; Success of third-sector decision makers when...

  • WORKER PARTICIPATION IN SWEDISH ENTERPRISE. Peterson, Richard B. // Monthly Labor Review;Apr70, Vol. 93 Issue 4, p48 

    Examines levels of worker influence on managerial decisions or policy in Swedish enterprises. Analysis of responses to a questionnaire sent to firms in Sweden; Emphasis on managerial prerogatives; Practice of consultation in Swedish collective bargaining; Scarcity of unilateral decisionmaking...

  • Fairness and Ethics in Social Decision Making. De Cremer, David; van Dijk, Eric // Social Justice Research;Sep2003, Vol. 16 Issue 3, p191 

    Focuses on the role and importance of fairness and ethics in social decision making. Impact of decisions on the welfare of others; Context in which decisions are also a function of the extent to which other parties and individuals are responsive to one's personal needs; Interdependence...

  • Political institutions and economic growth. Marsiliani, Laura; Renstr�m, Thomas // Economics of Governance;2007, Vol. 8 Issue 3, p233 

    We analyze the impact of micro-founded political institutions on economic growth in an overlapping-generations economy, where individuals differ in preferences over a public good (as well as in age). Labour- and capital taxes finance the public good and a public input. The benchmark institution...

  • LABOR UNION OBJECTIVE AND COLLECTIVE BARGAINING. Blair, Douglas H.; Crawford, David L. // Quarterly Journal of Economics;Aug84, Vol. 99 Issue 3, p547 

    We consider a model of labor union behavior in which workers make decisions about wages and employment by simple majority rule. We show that under general conditions such a union has a well-behaved objective function, different from those previously postulated in the literature. We then show...

  • ARTIFICIAL MARKETS AND THE THEORY OF GAMES. Montgomery, W. David // Public Choice;Summer1974, Vol. 18, p25 

    Looks at the role of the theory of games in the nature of bargaining process. Relationship between institutions ad transaction costs; Factors that affect private bargains; Key elements of transaction costs.

  • Fallback Bargaining. Brams, Steven; Kilgour, D. // Group Decision & Negotiation;Jul2001, Vol. 10 Issue 4, p287 

    Under fallback bargaining, bargainers begin by indicating their preference rankings over alternatives. They then fall back, in lockstep, to less and less preferred alternatives � starting with first choices, then adding second choices, and so on � until an alternative is found on which...

  • On the role of the hostage in ultimatum bargaining games. Shupp, Robert; Schmitt, Pamela; Swope, Kurtis // Journal of Socio-Economics;Jun2006, Vol. 35 Issue 3, p399 

    Abstract: This paper examines behavior in a three-player ultimatum game. The payoff to the non-decision-making player (the “hostage”) is separate from the bargaining pie and varies. We find that while responders may behave altruistically towards the hostage, they are more likely to...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sign out of this library

Other Topics