Significant Decisions in Labor Cases

October 1965
Monthly Labor Review;Oct65, Vol. 88 Issue 10, p1230
Academic Journal
Highlights court decisions on labor cases in the United States, as of October 1965. Court affirmation of a U.S. National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) decision on the legal rights of workers making a concerted effort to secure racially integrated working conditions; NLRB ruling on whether a union violated the law by fining and suspending a union member for filing a decertification petition.


Related Articles

  • Tupe update. McMullen, John // People Management;7/15/1999, Vol. 5 Issue 14, p25 

    Reports that the government of Great Britain is amending the provisions of Tupe and the equivalent provisions in section 188 of the Trade Union and Labor Relations Act of 1992 covering collective redundancies. Its objective; Information on the Collective Redundancies and Transfer of...

  • Federal Preemption.  // Monthly Labor Review;Jul66, Vol. 89 Issue 7, p777 

    Reports on the U.S. Supreme Court ruling on a case involving the responsibility of an international union concerning its intervention in an unauthorized action performed by its members. Details of the case; Legal precedents; Implications on laws governing industrial relations.

  • MPs propose restoring unions' power. Olah, Peter // Budapest Business Journal;06/10/2002, Vol. 10 Issue 27, p3 

    Focuses on a draft modification to the Labor Code filed by Hungarian Parliament members which aims to create more employee-friendly provisions, including increased power for unions. Obligatory compensation measures for employees working overtime or on holidays; Expectation that the changes will...

  • Vive la difference? Evason, John; Broussal, Denise // People Management;5/17/2001, Vol. 7 Issue 10, p18 

    Discusses the differences between British and French law on redundancy consultation. Sources of the laws; Requirements of directive 98/59; Employer's duties under the Trade Union and Labour Relations Act 1992; Sanctions for serious breach of the directive.

  • Workers have little to celebrate on Labor Day. Gleason, Stefan // Business Journal Serving Fresno & the Central San Joaquin Valley;09/04/2000, Issue 322664, p35 

    Comments on California Governor Gray Davis' provision of a multi-million dollar windfall of election-year cash to trade union officials in the state. Employees' footing of the bill; Union officials' imposition of a fine on a janitor who chose to work during a strike; Filing of class-action...

  • Statutory Instruments.  // Accountancy;May93, Vol. 111 Issue 1197, p101 

    Presents information about the coverage of regulations governing the trade union ballot scheme in Great Britain, under which the Certification Officer refunds independent trade unions the expenditure they incur in conducting certain ballots.

  • Derecognition of trade unions.  // Accountancy;Oct92, Vol. 110 Issue 1190, p102 

    Comments on the derecognition of trade unions under the Employment Protection Act 1978 in Great Britain. Introduction of personal contracts with employees; Example of cases involving derecognition of trade unions.

  • A thing of the past? O'Driscoll, Eliza // Employers Law;Apr2003, p6 

    Presents the views of several executives on a legislation drafted by the British government to outlaw union blacklisting. Paul Kearns, human resource (HR) strategist and director of PWC; Sarah Veale, employment policy officer at TUC; Malcolm Fiddler, vice-president of HR service at Airbus.

  • The Teamsters Prepare for Nationwide Contracts.  // Monthly Labor Review;Jul66, Vol. 89 Issue 7, pIII 

    Reports on developments in the U.S. Teamsters Union compiled as of July 1966. Changes concerning the control of the union from the local to the international level; Rules on union welfare and bargaining power; Developments relevant to trials of the members of the union; Implications on laws...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics